Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:35:40 +0200
From:      Mark Stapper <stark@mapper.nl>
To:        Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kernel designations terminology confusion -- amd64 used for	into quad core
Message-ID:  <4A7A79BC.1030600@mapper.nl>
In-Reply-To: <200908050654.26375.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>
References:  <200908051414.49468.david@vizion2000.net>	<20090805132755.GA21963@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <200908050654.26375.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:27:55 Erik Trulsson wrote:
>
>   
>> The amd64 architecture is called that because it was AMD who invented and
>> created it and was for a while the only one using it and since AMD named
>> the architecture AMD64 that was the name FreeBSD used too.  Later Intel
>> also started using it (while using their own name(s) for it), but FreeBSD
>> has stuck with the name amd64.
>>     
>
> This isn't completely correct. There is actually an ia64 architecture, before 
> Intel was ready to give up the "who dictates the PC 64bit architecture" 
> battle. There's a handful of CPU's who use that instruction set, but later 
> Intel switched to supporting AMD's instruction set and thus the PC 64 bit 
> architecture now is amd64.
>
> It'll be fun to see people asking in a few years why Oracle processors are 
> called "sparc64"...
>   
Now I come to think of it, isn't it strange apple(or IBM) never joined
in the whole 64-bits naming race spactacle.
No one ever calls a  PowerPC 970 processor a PowerPC-64, or a IBM64 or
anything like it...
Nor have I ever heard the term RISC64. Too bad we won't have to worry
about that anymore, since PowerPC is dead and Mac Pro's are now amd64(or
Intel 64 or x86-64 whichever would be the "correct" term ;-) )



[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkp6eb8ACgkQN9xNqOOVnWDJKwCgjH4rK+zROQk5qAke2GQTc/0E
g0EAn1hGVXde5NkIvg/5VB9yLLoMcVwY
=0ecg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A7A79BC.1030600>