Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:21:45 -0400 (EDT)
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/killall killall.1 killall.c src/usr.sbin Makefile src/usr.sbin/jail jail.8 jail.c src/usr.sbin/jexec Makefile jexec.8 jexec.c src/usr.sbin/jls Makefile jls.8 jls.c
Message-ID:  <XFMail.20030410142145.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304101108290.31875-100000@root.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 10-Apr-2003 Nate Lawson wrote:
> Please take this to arch@.  Headers changed appropriately.
> 
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On 09-Apr-2003 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>> > Whatever, path components should be path components.
>> 
>> You mean like this?
>> 
>> > sysctl -N net.inet.tcp.syncache
>> net.inet.tcp.syncache.bucketlimit
>> net.inet.tcp.syncache.cachelimit
>> net.inet.tcp.syncache.count
>> net.inet.tcp.syncache.hashsize
>> net.inet.tcp.syncache.rexmtlimit
> 
> The answer to your question will depend on whether or not he likes the
> sysctl namespace.  My question was different:  since jail already implies
> a location in file namespace, why implement a new and disjoint namespace
> for it?

jail -n one /foo/bar
jail -n two /foo/bar

The path for a jail is not necessairly unique across all jails.

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030410142145.jhb>