Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:21:45 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/killall killall.1 killall.c src/usr.sbin Makefile src/usr.sbin/jail jail.8 jail.c src/usr.sbin/jexec Makefile jexec.8 jexec.c src/usr.sbin/jls Makefile jls.8 jls.c Message-ID: <XFMail.20030410142145.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304101108290.31875-100000@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10-Apr-2003 Nate Lawson wrote: > Please take this to arch@. Headers changed appropriately. > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, John Baldwin wrote: >> On 09-Apr-2003 Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> > Whatever, path components should be path components. >> >> You mean like this? >> >> > sysctl -N net.inet.tcp.syncache >> net.inet.tcp.syncache.bucketlimit >> net.inet.tcp.syncache.cachelimit >> net.inet.tcp.syncache.count >> net.inet.tcp.syncache.hashsize >> net.inet.tcp.syncache.rexmtlimit > > The answer to your question will depend on whether or not he likes the > sysctl namespace. My question was different: since jail already implies > a location in file namespace, why implement a new and disjoint namespace > for it? jail -n one /foo/bar jail -n two /foo/bar The path for a jail is not necessairly unique across all jails. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030410142145.jhb>