Date: Mon, 4 Nov 1996 16:18:37 -0800 (PST) From: Veggy Vinny <richardc@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU> To: Stefan Esser <se@zpr.uni-koeln.de> Cc: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, FreeBSD-current users <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ncrcontrol in -current Message-ID: <Pine.PTX.3.95.961104161459.2357A-100000@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199611042036.VAA02139@x14.mi.uni-koeln.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 Nov 1996, Stefan Esser wrote: > The reason for a mismatch (if both ncrcontrol and the kernel > were in fact built from corresponding sources) is that you > specified some kernel config option (i.e. the maximum number > of LUNs or TAGs) that have not become visible to the build > process for ncrcontrol. Hmmm, okay... > So, please add those kernel options to the ncrcontrol Makefile > and rebuilt ncrcontrol, if that might be the cause of your > problem. Oh okay but I know I don't have any kernel options relating to the ncr since the other machines use Adaptec 2940W controllers and not the NCR-810. > I'm going to make ncrcontrol find all the parameters by some > other means (not from compile time options, that is :), but > this is not on top of my ToDo list ... Hmmm, that would be a good idea :) Vince GaiaNet Corporation - Unix Networking Operations - GUS Mailing Lists Admin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.PTX.3.95.961104161459.2357A-100000>