Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 18:26:28 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> To: FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: performance of ipfw and pf in CURRENT? Message-ID: <20140506182628.36c98065.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/XYKSfFgdQGL0cv2AOyC5sT4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A while ago some performance graphs were floating around here showing the n= et performance of ipfw and pf. pf was, as far as I can remember, the single th= readed version. Are there more recent performance benchmarks available? Even if pf= in FreeBSD is still behind pf in recent OpenBSD, FreeBSD has now an threaded adaption and= it would be nice to see the overall performance for both. Thanks, oh --Sig_/XYKSfFgdQGL0cv2AOyC5sT4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTaQ05AAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8cH0H/iUIzYK/XUrf0HzyAfcPew/L LMXU6qsnMq+WnPxLN2vCCiJGpCJeGe/YZYLGD6YVm+pAynYvthA4mvFNXqWxghik ZPivCg+lZOnC/TIXoKFjdv0G/rQxr1ZBLW9ax4dLmi0kZ5UQGHOsiYheVSs2Bvhy xQytWIU5syl75ptKld7TTysl99xucJGRnhZ2M6XtogGyD7ARCJN45HrLER0C+8JM KwTWc8Re0dp3qhFd4RfUJmE+TARuBlWBHu44fdZvM7y8iTdfqx5w+yM62Kh3ViLh spSNSK5RWqodduOU+lQh2Zj+wFdMuRA9a9L1hNq4L0+EAxOZWR0iusEP61lbdw8= =G4wj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/XYKSfFgdQGL0cv2AOyC5sT4--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140506182628.36c98065.ohartman>