Date: 16 Mar 2002 11:02:40 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Tim J. Robbins" <tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au>, freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patch for review: xargs standards compliance Message-ID: <xzp8z8svni7.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020316093507.B26394@FreeBSD.ORG> References: <20020315231100.A20942@FreeBSD.ORG> <20020316192629.A5254@descent.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20020316090004.A26394@FreeBSD.ORG> <xzpd6y4voj9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020316093507.B26394@FreeBSD.ORG>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 10:40:26AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > No, Solaris' xargs specifically checks that the argument to -E and -I > > is not empty. I have the source in front of me. > Should we do this then? Why not? An empty string doesn't make sense for either of them. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp8z8svni7.fsf>