Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 04:36:09 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: Sio & Puc memory mapped Message-ID: <20040515041301.O22881@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <40A4E2CB.2000007@cronyx.ru> References: <40A26162.9030607@cronyx.ru> <20040512.200542.09569104.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040513155109.GB6572@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <40A4E2CB.2000007@cronyx.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 May 2004, Roman Kurakin wrote: > May I ask you to make some tests for me? > > We have a set of tests, which we use for testings of our async > adapters. I add support for one of ours cards via puc(4)&uart(4) > drivers. These tests works fine with patches for sio(4) driver (was > tested with 5.2 sio), but fails with puc(4)&uart(4). > > I don't have any other cards supported by uart(4), so I can't test > it by my self. If you have a time and ability, I'll send these tests > for you. Why not just use sio? It has been tested for hundreds if not thousands of programmer hours in various versions over the last 16 years. uart fails even simple tests, and has low performance. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040515041301.O22881>