Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:52:25 +0200 From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... Message-ID: <200612201252.25858.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> In-Reply-To: <20061220093904.GD960@office.redwerk.com> References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <cb5206420612200105o312cea80ub9d45c6c445df305@mail.gmail.com> <20061220093904.GD960@office.redwerk.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=CE=A3=CF=84=CE=B9=CF=82 =CE=A4=CE=B5=CF=84=CE=AC=CF=81=CF=84=CE=B7 20 =CE= =94=CE=B5=CE=BA=CE=AD=CE=BC=CE=B2=CF=81=CE=B9=CE=BF=CF=82 2006 11:39, =CE= =BF/=CE=B7 Eugeny N Dzhurinsky =CE=AD=CE=B3=CF=81=CE=B1=CF=88=CE=B5: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:05:31PM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > On 12/20/06, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky <bofh@redwerk.com> wrote: > > >On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:15:12PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > > >> Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: > > >> > looks like I need to map libpthread.so.1 - not libpthread.so.2? > > >> > > >> If you're using 5.x, stay away from libthr - it was much slower back > > > > > >then. > > > > > >And it doesn't work well ;) > > > > Didn't! :) > > I was unable to test it with 6.1 at home, so I'm not sure. Btw, is it > possible to enable libthr for any application in FreeBSD 6.1 somehow, or = it > is probably not a good idea? I think this is a current hot topic of debate, take a look at=20 http://www.google.com/search?hl=3Den&q=3Dlibpthread+vs+libthr&btnG=3DGoogle= +Search =46or your case i'd say, stick with libpthread for all apps (default) excep= t=20 java (use libthr there) =2D-=20 Achilleas Mantzios
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200612201252.25858.achill>