Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 12:52:25 +0200 From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... Message-ID: <200612201252.25858.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> In-Reply-To: <20061220093904.GD960@office.redwerk.com> References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <cb5206420612200105o312cea80ub9d45c6c445df305@mail.gmail.com> <20061220093904.GD960@office.redwerk.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Στις Τετάρτη 20 Δεκέμβριος 2006 11:39, ο/η Eugeny N Dzhurinsky έγραψε: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 12:05:31PM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > On 12/20/06, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky <bofh@redwerk.com> wrote: > > >On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:15:12PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > > >> Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: > > >> > looks like I need to map libpthread.so.1 - not libpthread.so.2? > > >> > > >> If you're using 5.x, stay away from libthr - it was much slower back > > > > > >then. > > > > > >And it doesn't work well ;) > > > > Didn't! :) > > I was unable to test it with 6.1 at home, so I'm not sure. Btw, is it > possible to enable libthr for any application in FreeBSD 6.1 somehow, or it > is probably not a good idea? I think this is a current hot topic of debate, take a look at http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=libpthread+vs+libthr&btnG=Google+Search For your case i'd say, stick with libpthread for all apps (default) except java (use libthr there) -- Achilleas Mantzioshome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200612201252.25858.achill>