Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 22:38:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Zepeda <garbanzo@hooked.net> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: EGCS optimizations Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904052235060.55808-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <199904060525.WAA04269@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > There is nothing beyond -O2. Well, there's -O3, which tries to > inline static functions, but that typically isn't beneficial because > it really bloats up the code and subroutine calls on intel cpus are > very fast. Really? The pgcc web page (goof.com/pcg) lead me to believe that there were a few more optimizations turned on by -O5 && -O6.. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9904052235060.55808-100000>