Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 21:25:44 +0200 From: Fredrik Lindberg <fli@shapeshifter.se> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>, Ivan Voras <ivoras@gmail.com> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 119527 for review Message-ID: <46422038.4030409@shapeshifter.se> In-Reply-To: <200705091505.39795.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200705082229.l48MTrbh069129@repoman.freebsd.org> <9bbcef730705090710h653dc15bjb7a1159484c1c48b@mail.gmail.com> <4641E19F.80809@shapeshifter.se> <200705091505.39795.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 May 2007 10:58:39 am Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
>> Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> On 09/05/07, Fredrik Lindberg <fli@shapeshifter.se> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok, I'll take a look at the various queue.h shipped with the major BSDs,
>>>> and see if I can find a common subset that suits my needs (without too
>>>> many compromises) and based on the findings I'll reconsider my choice.
>>> I use sys/queue.h in my userland applications all the time, there's no
>>> problem there.
>>>
>> And it works on {Net,Open}BSD?, I could swear that I've been bitten by
>> sys/queue.h in the past when moving stuff between FreeBSD and NetBSD.
>> Could have been those TAILQ-macros Robert Watson talked about though.
>
> Just include your own copy of sys/queue.h for systems whose queue.h isn't up
> to snuff. You don't have to use the OS-native one, it's ok to carry one
> around, but then you have one less copy of the wheel.
>
Yes, that's true. We can drop this discussion/bikeshed now, I submitted
a change ~3 hours ago :)
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=119564
Change 119564 by fli@fli_genesis on 2007/05/09 16:13:23
Nuke my own-rolled list and replace with sys/queue.h
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46422038.4030409>