Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:00:03 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin Makefile pkg-plist ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/files spamd.sh Message-ID: <20040113190003.GA30277@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200401130829.i0D8TStA046149@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200401130829.i0D8TStA046149@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 12:29:28AM -0800, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> edwin 2004/01/13 00:29:28 PST
>
> FreeBSD ports repository
>
> Modified files:
> mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin Makefile pkg-plist
> mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/files spamd.sh
> Log:
> [PATCH] mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin 2.60
>
> This patch adds rc_subr support to spamd daemon
> of the spamassassin port.
>
> PR: ports/57384
Why does this have to be so complicated??
+USE_RC_SUBR= yes
+RC_DIR= ${PREFIX}/etc/rc.d
+RC_SUFX= .sh
+SED_SCRIPT+= -e 's|%%RC_SUBR%%|${RC_SUBR}|g' \
+ -e 's|%%RC_DIR%%|${RC_DIR}|g' \
+ -e 's|%%RC_SUFX%%|${RC_SUFX}|g'
+PLIST_SUB+= RC_DIR=${RC_DIR} \
+ RC_SUFX=${RC_SUFX}
* Is RC_SUFX changing anytime soon? Isn't it always ".sh"?
* Doesn't the PLIST_SUB for RC_DIR put absolute paths into the PLIST,
which isn't needed. PLIST already has %D for that.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040113190003.GA30277>