Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:55:42 -0600
From:      Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, <gnome@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Naming cheme for GNOME2 ports
Message-ID:  <B88EC14E.5D8E%ade@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <3C695911.5BAB5E89@FreeBSD.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On 02/12/02 12:04, "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> What do people think about naming scheme for the GNOME2 core
> components that already have their GNOME1 counterparts in the tree
> (i.e. gnomefoo-1.x.x vs. gnomefoo-1.99.x)? Should we just add `2'
> suffix, or something like `-devel'? Any ideas are appreciated.

I'd go for the '2' suffix, since we're eventually going to end up with
x11/gnome2 etc.

-aDe


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message



help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B88EC14E.5D8E%ade>