Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:55:42 -0600 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, <gnome@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Naming cheme for GNOME2 ports Message-ID: <B88EC14E.5D8E%ade@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3C695911.5BAB5E89@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 02/12/02 12:04, "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > What do people think about naming scheme for the GNOME2 core > components that already have their GNOME1 counterparts in the tree > (i.e. gnomefoo-1.x.x vs. gnomefoo-1.99.x)? Should we just add `2' > suffix, or something like `-devel'? Any ideas are appreciated. I'd go for the '2' suffix, since we're eventually going to end up with x11/gnome2 etc. -aDe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B88EC14E.5D8E%ade>
