Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:19:59 -0500 From: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r209511 - head Message-ID: <20100624151959.6b00bfdd@anacreon.physics.wisc.edu> In-Reply-To: <201006241753.o5OHrPnU058288@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201006241753.o5OHrPnU058288@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:53:25 +0000 (UTC) Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > Author: imp > Date: Thu Jun 24 17:53:25 2010 > New Revision: 209511 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/209511 > > Log: > Merge from tbemd: > > use MACHINE_CPUARCH instead of MACHINE_CPU since the sources for the > CSU is based on MACHINE_CPUARCH > > Reviewed by: arch@ (twice) This is not always true. For example, on powerpc64, the ABI is different enough between powerpc and powerpc64, which share a CPUARCH, that the csu code shares very little. I can work around this with Makefile or preprocessor hacks, of course, but would be it be possible here instead to check for MACHINE_ARCH before falling back to MACHINE_CPUARCH? -Nathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100624151959.6b00bfdd>