Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:44:08 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net, jhugo@meraka.csir.co.za, mrossi@swin.edu.au, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPv6 accept_rtadv + bfe0 Message-ID: <4EA23C08.6060906@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20111019.162942.833544516395329713.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <201110182200.19244.jhugo@meraka.csir.co.za> <0BF0188F-777F-4FC3-9DB3-48FE22ACC31A@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4E9DFE11.2070203@swin.edu.au> <20111019.162942.833544516395329713.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/19/2011 00:29, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Mattia Rossi <mrossi@swin.edu.au> wrote > in <4E9DFE11.2070203@swin.edu.au>: > > mr> So the _ipv6 bit doesn't take care of passing "inet6" to ifconfig > mr> automatically? > > No. You always need to add the inet6 keyword wherever needed. That seems redundant, and contrary to how the IPv4 equivalents work. And obviously it's confusing to users. From what I can see looking at some 7.x and 8.x systems it also seems to be a POLA violation. Perhaps this is something that you should reconsider? Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EA23C08.6060906>