Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:33:39 -0800 From: Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org> To: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com> Cc: "Adam D. Marks" <amarks@ecst.csuchico.edu>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inetd? Message-ID: <38B1BD43.A09E29E9@gorean.org> References: <Pine.GHP.4.05.10002211329150.28778-100000@polio.ecst.csuchico.edu> <38B1B5D2.1478C9D2@gorean.org> <14513.47681.137038.821262@onceler.kcilink.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> >>>>> "DB" == Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org> writes:
>
> DB> "Adam D. Marks" wrote:
> >>
> >> I was curious if it is posible to have different inetd configurations for
> >> different network interfaces.
>
> DB> No, it's not. You could accomplish the same thing by enabling all of the
> DB> services you want in inetd.conf and then restricting access to those ports
>
> Then what's the -a parameter to inetd for? Why not just run two
> different inetd's bound to different IP addresses, one for each
> interface?
Well, that sounds like a good suggestion. I had assumed that the original
poster had taken the time to look at the man page.
Thanks for the tip,
Doug
--
"Welcome to the desert of the real."
- Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38B1BD43.A09E29E9>