Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 May 2011 12:11:08 -0700
From:      YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com>
To:        linimon@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kern/157287: [re] re0: INVARIANTS panic (Memory modified after free)
Message-ID:  <20110524191108.GH10984@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
In-Reply-To: <201105240930.p4O9UFiC015327@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <201105240930.p4O9UFiC015327@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:30:15AM +0000, linimon@freebsd.org wrote:
> Old Synopsis: re0: INVARIANTS panic (Memory modified after free)
> New Synopsis: [re] re0: INVARIANTS panic (Memory modified after free)
> 
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
> Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
> Responsible-Changed-When: Tue May 24 09:29:55 UTC 2011
> Responsible-Changed-Why: 
> Over to maintainer(s).
> 
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=157287
> _______________________________________________

Because the size is 4092 I vaguely guess it was not caused by
re(4). re(4) just uses either 2K or 9K clusters. Of course that
does mean re(4) is bug free here. Given that submitter can see
panic during booting which in turn means re(4) has little chance to
run, it might not be re(4)'s fault.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110524191108.GH10984>