Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 03:13:32 -0600 From: Bill Fumerola <billf@mu.org> To: opentrax@email.com Cc: peter@netplex.com.au, dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docs/24307: man page for inetd(8) missing /etc/protocols in FIL ES section Message-ID: <20010115031332.A61857@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <200101150909.BAA02569@spammie.svbug.com>; from opentrax@email.com on Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:09:27AM -0800 References: <200101150853.f0F8r4Q01821@mobile.wemm.org> <200101150909.BAA02569@spammie.svbug.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:09:27AM -0800, opentrax@email.com wrote:
> > There is no need. There is no point adding a '/etc/protocols' to the FILES
> > list since inetd does not use the '/etc/protocols' file. At best it would
> > be misinformation.
> >
> Wait. How is this misinformation? I must be missing something.
Because /etc/protocols doesn't have to exist, could be wrong, etc and it doesn't
make a difference to inetd, because it _does not use it_.
--
Bill Fumerola - security yahoo / Yahoo! inc.
- fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010115031332.A61857>