Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:26:45 -0400 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: State of gvinum RELENG_5 or RELENG_5_4 ?! Message-ID: <20050513012645.GF1061@eucla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <4283736B.10805@incubus.de> References: <8b6eae96050510071037d3b6e4@mail.gmail.com> <4280C277.4030904@jim-liesl.org> <27C1250C-9BFD-4FA8-876C-09DF5504B058@isncom.com> <4280EE3C.8050505@jim-liesl.org> <20050511095142.GA12629@ella.physik.tu-berlin.de> <428243EA.9070707@jim-liesl.org> <20050512060034.GA25077@ella.physik.tu-berlin.de> <4283736B.10805@incubus.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, 12 May 2005 at 17:16:59 +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Peter Orlowski wrote: > >>> At this point, I'm thinking that as far as S/W RAID goes in FreeBSD, the >>> "R" is pretty meaningless >> >> Well, "R" does not mean "redundant" but "realtime backup" ;-(. > > BTW., what is the status of RaidFrame on FreeBSD? I remember some time > ago people were working on integrating it into 5.x or so? I have good > experience with Raidframe on NetBSD, and less good with vinum on FreeBSD > so I'd be delighted if Raidframe could make it into FreeBSD (and work > equally well, of course). RAIDFrame was introduced to FreeBSD some years ago, but died during to lack of love. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050513012645.GF1061>