Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 22:41:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Jason Godsey <godsey@godsey.net> Cc: FreeBSD Security Advisories <security-advisories@freebsd.org>, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Ports Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-00:23.ip-options [REVISED] Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007122237540.72580-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007122213070.70682-100000@mail.godsey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Jason Godsey wrote:
> This doesn't look to fit the subject: FreeBSD Ports
Yes, it was a typo..I forgot to remove 'Ports' from the mail header from
the previous advisory I sent out.
> I have a filter that looks for FreeBSD and pages me, it however skips port
> advisories since I don't use any ports. Thanks!
You must have set that up quickly, since I only started doing that a few
days ago :-)
I'll try and be more vigilant in future, but I can't guarantee I won't
slip up again. I suggest you don't autofilter them, but do it manually -
it will only take a second to verify from the contents that it's a ports
advisory. If you really must do this, I suggest you filter on "Catgeory:
ports" in the body, not the message header which is tacked on at the last
step when I send the advisory out.
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007122237540.72580-100000>