Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2017/freebsd-ports/20171224.freebsd-ports

Messages: 158, new messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:22:35 2023

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Dec 23 Hajimu UMEMOTO             Re: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
  2. Dec 23 Hajimu UMEMOTO             Re: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
  3. Dec 23 Yasuhiro KIMURA            Re: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
  4. Dec 23 Joseph Mingrone            Re: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
  5. Dec 23 Joseph Mingrone            Re: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
  6. Dec 23 Joseph Mingrone            Are these Emacs ports still useful?
  7. Dec 23 Joseph Mingrone            Re: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
  8. Dec 23 Yasuhiro KIMURA            Re: Are these Emacs ports still useful?
  9. Dec 23 Matthias Apitz             Re: Procmail got updated!
 10. Dec 23 Ted Hatfield               Re: Procmail got updated!
 11. Dec 23 portscout@FreeBSD.org      FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
 12. Dec 23 Matthias Andree            Re: Procmail got updated!
 13. Dec 23 Eugene Grosbein            Re: Procmail got updated!
 14. Dec 23 emilia                     Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check
 15. Dec 23 Kevin Oberman              Re: Procmail got updated!
 16. Dec 22 Yuri                       [feature suggestion] Closed source binaries need to be labeled in ports, and explicitly allowed by users (suggesting the tag TRUST_CLOSED_SOUR
 17. Dec 22 Ed Maste                   Re: Ports and LLVM's lld linker
 18. Dec 22 Sid                        Re: OSS Audio
 19. Dec 22 Sid                        Re: Canberra
 20. Dec 22 portscout@FreeBSD.org      FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date


21. Dec 22 Matthias Andree Re: Procmail got updated! 22. Dec 22 blubee blubeeme Re: Canberra 23. Dec 22 Eugene Grosbein Re: Procmail got updated! 24. Dec 22 Sid Re: Canberra 25. Dec 22 Matthias Andree Re: Procmail got updated! 26. Dec 21 Grzegorz Junka Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 27. Dec 21 Dmytro Bilokha Re: Setting system user home directory 28. Dec 21 Sid Re: OSS Audio 29. Dec 21 Mathieu Arnold Re: FLAVOR for Qt4 and Qt5 (was Re: Flavor or not for this port?) 30. Dec 21 Rainer Hurling Re: FLAVOR for Qt4 and Qt5 (was Re: Flavor or not for this port?) 31. Dec 21 blubee blubeeme Re: Canberra 32. Dec 21 Andrea Venturoli Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 33. Dec 21 portscout@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date 34. Dec 21 Niclas Zeising Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 35. Dec 21 Guido Falsi Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 36. Dec 21 Eugene Grosbein Re: Procmail got updated! 37. Dec 21 Eugene Grosbein Re: Procmail got updated! 38. Dec 21 Eugene Grosbein Re: Procmail got updated! 39. Dec 21 Mathieu Arnold Re: Again, flavors or options? 40. Dec 21 Yuri Re: Again, flavors or options?
41. Dec 21 Johannes Lundberg Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 42. Dec 21 Mathieu Arnold Re: Again, flavors or options? 43. Dec 21 Shane Ambler Re: Again, flavors or options? 44. Dec 21 Matthias Andree Re: Procmail got updated! 45. Dec 21 Dave Horsfall Re: Procmail got updated! 46. Dec 21 Freddie Cash Re: Again, flavors or options? 47. Dec 21 Adam Weinberger Re: Procmail got updated! 48. Dec 21 Ted Hatfield Re: Procmail got updated! 49. Dec 21 Michael Gmelin Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 50. Dec 21 Yuri Again, flavors or options? 51. Dec 21 Sid Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 52. Dec 21 Chris H Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 53. Dec 21 Sid Re: Canberra 54. Dec 21 Kevin Oberman Re: Procmail got updated! 55. Dec 21 Kevin Oberman Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 56. Dec 21 Matthias Andree Re: Procmail got updated! 57. Dec 20 Michael Gmelin Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 58. Dec 20 Walter Schwarzenfeld Re: some fix needed still 59. Dec 20 roberthuff@rcn.com Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 60. Dec 20 Pete Wright Re: Vote: making wayland=on default
61. Dec 20 Niclas Zeising Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 62. Dec 20 Stefan Esser Re: some fix needed still 63. Dec 20 net@arrishq.net Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 64. Dec 20 Ultima Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 65. Dec 20 Stefan Esser Re: Setting system user home directory 66. Dec 20 Dmytro Bilokha Re: Setting system user home directory 67. Dec 20 Johannes Lundberg Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 68. Dec 20 Chris H Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 69. Dec 20 Yuri Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 70. Dec 20 Sid re: Vote: making wayland=on default 71. Dec 20 blubee blubeeme Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 72. Dec 20 Johannes Lundberg Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 73. Dec 20 Chris H Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 74. Dec 20 Miroslav Lachman Re: Setting system user home directory 75. Dec 20 Adam Vande More Re: Setting system user home directory 76. Dec 20 Johannes Lundberg Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 77. Dec 20 Tommi Pernila Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 78. Dec 20 Michael Gmelin Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 79. Dec 20 Baptiste Daroussin Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 80. Dec 20 Sergio de Almeida Lenzi some fix needed still
81. Dec 20 Johannes Lundberg Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 82. Dec 20 Carmel NY Re: Vote: making wayland=on default 83. Dec 20 Rodrigo Osorio Re: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224205 84. Dec 20 Stefan Lambrev https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224205 85. Dec 20 blubee blubeeme Re: Canberra 86. Dec 20 Sid Re: Canberra 87. Dec 20 Johannes Lundberg Vote: making wayland=on default 88. Dec 20 Walter Schwarzenfeld Re: Xorg server update 89. Dec 20 blubee blubeeme Re: Canberra 90. Dec 20 Sid Re: Canberra 91. Dec 20 Eugene Grosbein Re: Procmail got updated! 92. Dec 20 emilia Xorg server update 93. Dec 20 Walter Schwarzenfeld Re: devel/R-cran-gsubfn: broken because of missing dependency 94. Dec 19 Mark Millard rpi2 V1.1 vs. hard coded max_execution_time figures in /usr/local/share/poudriere/common.sh (package; also: extract, install, deinstall) 95. Dec 19 L.Bartoletti Re: FLAVOR for Qt4 and Qt5 (was Re: Flavor or not for this port?) 96. Dec 19 Ted Hatfield Re: Procmail got updated! 97. Dec 19 Matthias Andree Re: Procmail got updated! 98. Dec 19 L.Bartoletti Re: pkg flavors breaks "make run-depends-list" 99. Dec 19 Roger Marquis Re: Procmail got updated! 100. Dec 19 Adam Vande More Re: Procmail got updated!
101. Dec 19 Roger Marquis Re: Procmail got updated! 102. Dec 19 portscout@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date 103. Dec 19 Christoph Moench-Tegeder Re: Procmail got updated! 104. Dec 19 Rainer Hurling Re: devel/R-cran-gsubfn: broken because of missing dependency 105. Dec 19 Alexander Leidinger Re: OSS Audio 106. Dec 19 Walter Schwarzenfeld Re: devel/R-cran-gsubfn: broken because of missing dependency 107. Dec 19 blubee blubeeme Re: Canberra 108. Dec 19 Sid Re: Canberra 109. Dec 19 Walter Schwarzenfeld Re: devel/R-cran-gsubfn: broken because of missing dependency 110. Dec 19 Walter Schwarzenfeld Re: A small problem after switching from portmaster to synth 111. Dec 19 Stefan Esser Re: pkg flavors breaks "make run-depends-list" 112. Dec 19 Rainer Hurling devel/R-cran-gsubfn: broken because of missing dependency 113. Dec 19 Sid Re: Canberra 114. Dec 19 blubee blubeeme Re: Canberra 115. Dec 19 Eugene Grosbein Re: Procmail got updated! 116. Dec 19 Kevin Oberman Re: A small problem after switching from portmaster to synth 117. Dec 19 Sid Re: Canberra 118. Dec 19 Ed Maste Re: Ports and LLVM's lld linker 119. Dec 19 blubee blubeeme Re: Canberra 120. Dec 19 Sid Re: Canberra
121. Dec 19 Kurt Buff Re: A small problem after switching from portmaster to synth 122. Dec 19 Ted Hatfield Re: Procmail got updated! 123. Dec 18 lb Re: pkg flavors breaks "make run-depends-list" 124. Dec 18 Jonathan Chen Re: A small problem after switching from portmaster to synth 125. Dec 18 Sid Canberra 126. Dec 18 L.Bartoletti FLAVOR for Qt4 and Qt5 (was Re: Flavor or not for this port?) 127. Dec 18 Mathieu Arnold Re: Can we have multiple flavors for a port? 128. Dec 18 Mathieu Arnold Re: Option vs. flavor? 129. Dec 18 Dippery, Kyle Re: A small problem after switching from portmaster to synth 130. Dec 18 Mathieu Arnold Re: Can we have multiple flavors for a port? 131. Dec 18 Chris H Re: Procmail got updated! 132. Dec 18 Adam Vande More Re: Portmaster error 133. Dec 18 Kurt Buff A small problem after switching from portmaster to synth 134. Dec 18 Matthias Andree Re: Procmail got updated! 135. Dec 18 blubee blubeeme Re: OSS Audio 136. Dec 18 Alexander Leidinger Re: OSS Audio 137. Dec 18 Alexander Leidinger Re: OSS Audio 138. Dec 18 portscout@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date 139. Dec 18 blubee blubeeme Re: OSS Audio 140. Dec 17 Dave Horsfall Procmail got updated!
141. Dec 17 Adam Weinberger Re: Option vs. flavor? 142. Dec 17 Sid Re: OSS Audio 143. Dec 17 Dmytro Bilokha www/payara port update looking for committer 144. Dec 17 Yuri Re: Option vs. flavor? 145. Dec 17 bob prohaska Stopping make in a port 146. Dec 17 Adam Weinberger Re: Option vs. flavor? 147. Dec 17 blubee blubeeme Re: OSS Audio 148. Dec 17 portscout@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date 149. Dec 17 Gary J. Hayers Poudriere build of Python36 150. Dec 17 Stefan Esser Re: OSS Audio 151. Dec 17 Stefan Esser Re: new portmaster fails to build devel/py-libzfs@py36 because of failing cython 152. Dec 17 Matthew Seaman Re: Can we have multiple flavors for a port? 153. Dec 17 Rainer Hurling Re: Flavor or not for this port? 154. Dec 17 Yuri Re: Option vs. flavor? 155. Dec 17 Adam Weinberger Re: Option vs. flavor? 156. Dec 17 Shane Ambler Re: Option vs. flavor? 157. Dec 17 Jim Trigg Re: new portmaster fails to build devel/py-libzfs@py36 because of failing cython 158. Dec 17 blubee blubeeme Re: OSS Audio


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date