2011/freebsd-fs/20110501.freebsd-fs
Messages: 81, sorted by author
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:16:21 2023
|
|
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Apr 30 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3 Re: RFC: make the experimental NFS subsystem the default one 2. Apr 30 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3 Re: RFC: make the experimental NFS subsystem the default one 3. Apr 26 Alexander Best Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 4. Apr 28 Alexander Leidinger GPT & dump-partition 5. Apr 28 Alexander Leidinger Re: GPT & dump-partition 6. Apr 30 Alexander Leidinger Re: TRIM clustering 7. Apr 30 Alexander Motin Re: TRIM clustering 8. Apr 30 Alexander Motin Re: TRIM clustering 9. Apr 26 Alexander Motin Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 10. Apr 30 Alexander Motin TRIM clustering 11. Apr 26 Andrey V. Elsukov Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 12. Apr 28 Andriy Gapon Re: ZFS-Only FreeBSD and crashdump 13. Apr 26 Brooks Davis Re: Do the IDs under /dev/ufsid change when the partition is newfs'ed? 14. Apr 30 Chris Forgeron RE: ZFS v28 for 8.2-STABLE 15. Apr 27 Chris Forgeron RE: make the experimental NFS subsystem the default one 16. Apr 25 Conall O'Brien Re: Problems Terminating zpool scrub... 17. Apr 26 Conall O'Brien Re: Problems Terminating zpool scrub... 18. Apr 26 Conall O'Brien Re: Problems Terminating zpool scrub... 19. Apr 27 Daniel Kalchev Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old, names? 20. Apr 25 Doug Barton Do the IDs under /dev/ufsid change when the partition is newfs'ed?
21. Apr 26 Doug Barton Re: Do the IDs under /dev/ufsid change when the partition is newfs'ed? 22. Apr 26 Doug Barton Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 23. Apr 26 Doug Barton Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 24. Apr 26 Doug Barton Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 25. Apr 26 Doug Barton Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 26. Apr 26 Doug Barton Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 27. Apr 27 Doug Barton Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 28. Apr 25 Doug Barton Re: panic: ext2fs_alloccg: map corrupted 29. Apr 26 Doug Barton Re: panic: ext2fs_alloccg: map corrupted 30. Apr 26 Doug Barton Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 31. Apr 25 Doug Barton panic: ext2fs_alloccg: map corrupted 32. Apr 27 Freddie Cash Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 33. Apr 25 FreeBSD bugmaster Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org 34. Apr 28 Guido Falsi Re: ZFS v28 for 8.2-STABLE 35. Apr 27 Jason J. Hellenthal Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 36. Apr 27 Jason J. Hellenthal Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 37. Apr 27 Jason J. Hellenthal Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 38. Apr 29 Jason J. Hellenthal Re: ZFS v28 for 8.2-STABLE 39. Apr 26 Jeremy Chadwick Re: Problems Terminating zpool scrub... 40. Apr 26 Jeremy Chadwick Re: Problems Terminating zpool scrub...
41. Apr 30 Jeremy Chadwick Re: TRIM clustering 42. Apr 27 Jeremy Chadwick Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 43. Apr 27 Jeremy Chadwick Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 44. Apr 30 Jeremy Chadwick Re: ZFS v28 for 8.2-STABLE 45. Apr 25 John Baldwin Re: panic: ext2fs_alloccg: map corrupted 46. Apr 26 John Baldwin Re: panic: ext2fs_alloccg: map corrupted 47. Apr 30 Julian Elischer Re: TRIM clustering 48. Apr 30 Julian Elischer Re: TRIM clustering 49. Apr 25 Konstantin Kuklin Re: zfs problem vdev I/O failure 50. Apr 24 Konstantin Kuklin zfs problem vdev I/O failure 51. Apr 30 Kostik Belousov newnfs client and statfs 52. Apr 26 Lev Serebryakov Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 53. Apr 27 Lev Serebryakov Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old, names? 54. Apr 29 Marco van Tol Re: ZFS-Only FreeBSD and crashdump 55. Apr 27 Matthew Dillon Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 56. Apr 26 Mikael Fridh Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 57. Apr 27 Miroslav Lachman Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old, names? 58. Apr 28 Ollivier Robert Re: GPT & dump-partition 59. Apr 29 Ollivier Robert Re: GPT & dump-partition 60. Apr 28 Ollivier Robert Re: ZFS v28 for 8.2-STABLE
61. Apr 29 Ollivier Robert Re: ZFS v28 for 8.2-STABLE 62. Apr 27 Pan Tsu Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 63. Apr 28 Pawel Tyll Re: ZFS v28 for 8.2-STABLE 64. Apr 24 Pawel Tyll Re: zfs problem vdev I/O failure 65. Apr 27 Peter Jeremy Re: Why not just name the cam-ata devices the same as the old names? 66. Apr 30 Pierre Lamy Re: ZFS v28 for 8.2-STABLE 67. Apr 30 Rick Macklem Re: RFC: make the experimental NFS subsystem the default one 68. Apr 30 Rick Macklem Re: RFC: make the experimental NFS subsystem the default one 69. Apr 27 Rick Macklem Re: make the experimental NFS subsystem the default one 70. Apr 28 Ruslan QuAzI Re[2]: ZFS v28 for 8.2-STABLE 71. Apr 28 Ruslan Yakovlev ZFS v28 for 8.2-STABLE 72. Apr 28 Sergey Kandaurov Re: GPT & dump-partition 73. Apr 28 Vladislav V. Prodan Re: ZFS-Only FreeBSD and crashdump 74. Apr 28 Vladislav V. Prodan ZFS-Only FreeBSD and crashdump 75. Apr 29 Volodymyr Kostyrko Re: ZFS v28 for 8.2-STABLE 76. Apr 28 Yuri Pankov Re: ZFS-Only FreeBSD and crashdump 77. Apr 26 ambrosehuang ambrose Re: Problems Terminating zpool scrub... 78. Apr 24 dfilter service Re: kern/156545: commit references a PR 79. Apr 28 grarpamp Softupdates and umount, bug, fixed? 80. Apr 24 kib@FreeBSD.org Re: kern/156545: [ufs] mv could break UFS on SMP systems
81. Apr 28 krad Re: ZFS v28 for 8.2-STABLE
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date