Date: Wed, 22 Mar 1995 19:07:17 -0800 (PST) From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> To: paul@isl.cf.ac.uk (Paul Richards) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, faq@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Why IDE is bad Message-ID: <199503230307.TAA07865@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <199503230306.DAA05310@isl.cf.ac.uk> from "Paul Richards" at Mar 23, 95 03:06:01 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In reply to Poul-Henning Kamp who said > > > > I just made a simple test, this shows why IDE is inferior to SCSI for > > FreeBSD: > > > > Well, no-one doubted this but your test is a little unfair on EIDE. You may > still end up being right but until we have true EIDE support we can't really > judge how well it's going to perform. As you will notice, I compared IDE to SCSI, not EIDE to SCSI When we have EIDE, I will damn that in a separate message :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@login.dknet.dk> -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503230307.TAA07865>