Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 19:29:38 +0000 From: Anatoly Vorobey <mellon@pobox.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ViM vs. Emacs Message-ID: <20000419192938.A60608@happy.checkpoint.com> In-Reply-To: <200004191224.IAA51625@server.baldwin.cx>; from jhb@FreeBSD.ORG on Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 08:24:29AM -0400 References: <20000419103521.A2972@cichlids.cichlids.com> <200004191224.IAA51625@server.baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 08:24:29AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 19-Apr-00 Alexander Langer wrote: > > FYI: ViM is better than Emacs. > > /me thwaps Alex with xemacs I wonder, though, if I'm the only person around who have committed the atrocity of building xemacs with --without-x . -- Anatoly Vorobey, mellon@pobox.com http://pobox.com/~mellon/ "Angels can fly because they take themselves lightly" - G.K.Chesterton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000419192938.A60608>