Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 02:08:33 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@chello.cz> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Change to INDEX format Message-ID: <20051018000833.GF71766@isis.sigpipe.cz> In-Reply-To: <20040619111157.GA506@isis.wad.cz> References: <20040619021700.GA27883@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040619111157.GA506@isis.wad.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# neuhauser@chello.cz / 2004-06-19 13:11:57 +0200:
> # kris@obsecurity.org / 2004-06-18 19:17:00 -0700:
> > This patch extends the format of the INDEX file to separately list
> > FETCH_DEPENDS, EXTRACT_DEPENDS and PATCH_DEPENDS instead of lumping
> > them all together with BUILD_DEPENDS.
>
> Do you think this needs to be reflected in the 'search' target in
> bsd.port.subdir.mk?
I'm updating Mk/bsd.port.subdir.mk to make searching and display
of the 11th to 13th field possible, and I have a question: what
should happen to the default display? Should the F-deps, E-deps,
P-deps fields be displayed by default?
--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man. You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051018000833.GF71766>