Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:17:22 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" <conrads@cox.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -> portmaster Rosetta Stone? Message-ID: <4F51D392.8080605@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120303010602.6daeb272@cox.net> References: <CA%2BE3k93doEmK7YpiZLgBCB5WUmOeCCLLLQBak_-Nx8sGqiafhQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABzXLYM47FjwmEvKijOp41Hn0KhTTPJ-dnX58PxTS8oUff-THQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F4BA7CE.20107@FreeBSD.org> <20120303010602.6daeb272@cox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/2/2012 11:06 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
> Doug, is there a way to emulate portupgrade's "-k" (keep going) option,
> to have the remaining list of ports to be built still continue
> processing even if one port's build fails?
You haven't missed it, the answer is no. It's part of that "portmaster
can't read minds" problem that if something fails, I have no way of
knowing if the rest of the updates should stop as a result.
I may add it someday, but it's not trivial, and it's not a priority.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F51D392.8080605>