Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:15:19 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net> Cc: "Leonardo M. Ram?" <martinrame@yahoo.com>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Greg Byshenk <freebsd@byshenk.net> Subject: Re: fsck_ufs running too often Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK2q_9=cp6tQ__H9U9UDvbvmocF3sgc7jx_yYjRqALv01A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120624025451.GA17721@DataIX.net> References: <1340401637.32116.YahooMailNeo@web113519.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <3729A720-2C8F-4C84-B05A-201394C40D63@gothic.net.au> <20120624013624.GG24842@portland1.byshenk.net> <20120624025451.GA17721@DataIX.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Jason Hellenthal <jhellenthal@dataix.net>wrote: > > At one point it was proven that background fsck was not benefitial. Where can we find this "proof"? -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK2q_9=cp6tQ__H9U9UDvbvmocF3sgc7jx_yYjRqALv01A>