Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:10:19 -0800 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Refactoring asynchronous I/O Message-ID: <18990810.Gs6uxxBMa9@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <20160211223238.GA73182@stack.nl> References: <2793494.0Z1kBV82mT@ralph.baldwin.cx> <2604669.yblYTI1T32@ralph.baldwin.cx> <20160211223238.GA73182@stack.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, February 11, 2016 11:32:38 PM Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 04:21:30PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > I've pushed a new version with a vfs.aio.enable_unsafe sysctl > > (defaults to off). If you think this is ok then I'll work on cleaning > > up some of the module bits (removing the unload support mostly). I > > figure marking the syscalls as STD and removing all the helper stuff > > can be done as a followup commit to reduce extra noise in this diff > > (which is large enough on its own). > > > https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/compare/master...bsdjhb:aio_rework > > > (Also, for the inital commit I will leave out the socket protocol > > hook. That can be added later.) > > Looks good to me, except that the error should be [ENOTSUP] instead of > the overloaded [EINVAL]. Ok. I've done some further cleanups and posted a commit candidate at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5289 for anyone else who is interested. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18990810.Gs6uxxBMa9>