Date: Sat, 04 Nov 1995 09:03:43 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hmmmm! `resvport' keyword not documented *anywhere*? Message-ID: <7836.815504623@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 04 Nov 1995 11:56:53 EST." <9511041656.AA07290@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Find it difficult all you want, but that is the correct syntax. Well, I just checked and you're right. My apologies. I'm still thinking "yuck", mind you, since none of the other "commonly used" option names have dashes preceeding them and I have to wonder why `resvport' was added as a keyword in the first place if nobody was even going to bother to document it. Sigh. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7836.815504623>