Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 18:54:51 +0200 From: Udo Erdelhoff <ue@nathan.ruhr.de> To: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: man.cgi links in FAQ Message-ID: <20000721185451.H66732@nathan.ruhr.de> In-Reply-To: <20000721162657.J64132@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk>; from ben@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 04:26:57PM %2B0100 References: <20000721162657.J64132@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 04:26:57PM +0100, Ben Smithurst wrote: > Does anyone have a good reason why these can't be taken out and shot Well, ammo *is* expensive :-) > replaced with the &man.foo.1; entities, I think it's a good idea. Yodel if you'd like some help. You'll have to complete the list of man entities first. See my next mail. > Ditto for ports.cgi links? I guess <application> would be a suitable > replacement for a lot of those. Either <application> or <command>, we don't have the necessary &man.foo.x; entities for them. /s/Udo -- "What part of no don't you understand?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000721185451.H66732>