Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 17:32:35 +0530 From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in> To: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux kernel and FreeBSD neck and neck? Message-ID: <20000728173235.A13136@physics.iisc.ernet.in> In-Reply-To: <20000728124727.A58850@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>; from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org on Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 12:47:27PM %2B0100 References: <20000728124727.A58850@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I recently read than the linux 2.2 kernel pretty much evened the TCP/IP > performance difference between Linux and BSD. Now i read somewhere that the > 2.4 kernel is expected to match BSD pretty much across the board. Is there > anywhere where BSD is still head and shoulders above in performance? Are > there any projects in the works besides SMP that wmight give us a leg up > again? From what I've read (second hand info, I haven't checked it) SMP was the one thing where linux was clearly ahead of BSD. In nearly everything else, the BSD's (FreeBSD, at least) are ahead, even of linux 2.4, by varying margins. Linux can't be too bad at tcp/ip if it runs sites like google and deja.com. On the other hand, I don't think the 2.2 kernel matches BSD in that. 2.4 is supposed to have severe problems with memory management, one of the things holding it back from release. From what I've seen on machines I've used, 2.2 definitely isn't as good at memory management as FreeBSD either. Rahul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000728173235.A13136>