Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:22:46 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle Message-ID: <20120125202246.GA26447@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <CACqU3MWS92tn0zUV=PGRYqjz-2K=6mgSU0M1tM7KnrsFhNaJ_g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACqU3MXGxRpyT4CDHmzpvzwSPsFi1MHxWa6C9RJiJ1jditWB4Q@mail.gmail.com> <20120125072809.GA11115@lonesome.com> <CACqU3MWS92tn0zUV=PGRYqjz-2K=6mgSU0M1tM7KnrsFhNaJ_g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 03:58:41AM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > > You seem to be obsessed by picking over > > semantics and finding shortcomings to be aggreived over. > > > Semantics and proper, independent, API are crucial. I'm talking about the semantics of the non-technical part: the wording of things that people post in email. viz: the time-wasting nonsense about "oh, it seems to be released already, has anyone noticed?" from a few weeks ago. It was 100% FUD, which apparently you knew perfectly well at the time, and thus AFAICT only posted it to draw attention to yourself. That's the drama I'm talking about. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120125202246.GA26447>