Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:43:06 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fix for CONFLICTS in emulators/linux_base ports Message-ID: <22672149@h30.sp.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <4A242BF1.9050202@FreeBSD.org> (Greg Larkin's message of "Mon\, 01 Jun 2009 15\:28\:49 -0400") References: <4A242BF1.9050202@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(Seems I've got this mail by private email and send an answer. but for archieves I'll duplicate it here.) On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:28:49 -0400 Greg Larkin wrote: > Hi emulation team, > I'm working on a PR for graphics/linux-ac3d, and it required me to > upgrade my linux_base-fc-4_14 package. I noticed that the newer > linux_base-f ports don't include the correct package name in CONFLICTS > for the older port. Thanks for taking care of it. I should have done it myself but you know there are always other first-aid-things to do... :-( > I have included a patch for the ports that you maintain. Please review > it when you have a moment and let me know what you think. > http://people.freebsd.org/~glarkin/diffs/bsam-linux_base.diff Some thoughts: . I'm not sure if names without * can match anything (and anyway if they do, ex. linux_base-fc will match linux_base-fc6, the third diff); . there are more linux_base ports now (including linux_base-f9, linux_base-f10). They should be included into CONFLICTS and their CONFLICTS should be considered either. Thanks once more! WBR -- bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22672149>