Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 18:54:13 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: tetragon@cyber.com.au Cc: Tom <tom@uniserve.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS question.. Message-ID: <37355B45.6F9B43B5@newsguy.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9905082352270.11097-100000@shell.uniserve.ca> <373544F8.2CA1CFBD@bitey.cyber.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gavan McCormack wrote: > > > > I have been hearing around that NFSv3 is the only 'good' NFS, and so far no > > > free Unixen have v3 implemented yet. I guess we will just have to wait.. :/ > > This isn't right either. FreeBSD has had NFSv3 for quite some time. It > > just needs more testing. > > I assume you mean in -CURRENT? This is the -STABLE list remember. :) Still, Wrong. AFAIK, even 2.2.x has nfsv3. But only in 3.x the default became nfsv3 instead of v2. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Proof of Trotsky's farsightedness is that _none_ of his predictions have come true yet." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37355B45.6F9B43B5>