Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:08:59 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: Martin Nilsson <martin@gneto.com> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache Message-ID: <4450EC9B.1050101@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <44505784.2030806@gneto.com> References: <20060425090739.8470143f.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <005301c668ab$39c4c150$8b00a8c0@multiplay.co.uk> <444E8F8A.9030409@rogers.com> <17487.34074.833134.823847@canoe.dclg.ca> <444F8912.4010604@rogers.com> <44505784.2030806@gneto.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Martin Nilsson wrote: > Mike Jakubik wrote: >> As much as i love AMDs cpus, the availability of good server >> motherboards and chipsets stinks, hopefully that will change when >> socket AM2 comes out. > > That is an old myth: http://www.supermicro.com/Aplus/ Its not an old myth. Find me a single cpu opteron board, with dual Intel network cards (bge and nve suck ass) connected to a PCIe bus. Sorry, it doesn't exist. You have your pick of the old AMD chipset, the crappy Nvidia, or the unsupported ServerWorks, which still doesn't have PCIe.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4450EC9B.1050101>