Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:53:57 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ? Message-ID: <78871850@bb.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20090810071850.GB1238@gothic.blackend.org> (Marc Fonvieille's message of "Mon\, 10 Aug 2009 09\:18\:50 %2B0200") References: <20090725013500.GC62402@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725073805.GA11455@abigail.blackend.org> <20090806211401.GB2546@pollux.local.net> <68208453@h30.sp.ipt.ru> <20090809160121.GA1621@pollux.local.net> <00339944@bb.ipt.ru> <20090810071850.GB1238@gothic.blackend.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:18:50 +0200 Marc Fonvieille wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 08:22:47PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > > Well, as for fc4 ports, Fedora Core 4 is unmaintained for > > a long time and there is no hope to get an updated version. > > The same seems to happen with f8 port. > This is annoying cause it means default linux_base under 7.X is a "no > way" in future: I mean when some linux apps will be updated people using > 7.X and default linux_base may face up to issues. And on another hand I > understood that some missing sysctl calls etc. prevents the switch to > f10 under 7.X. So what is the good solution for the future? As Sean has said 7-STABLE is in a good state to use -f10- ports. However, even Fedora 10 distros have not been updated so far... If you need a workstation with modern linuxulator consider trying 8.x. Write here what is not working and we'll try to overcome it. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?78871850>