Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:24:49 +0100 From: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> To: Borja Marcos <borjam@sarenet.es> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>, Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Subject: Re: Many processes stuck in zfs Message-ID: <BFF1E2D6-B48A-4A5E-ACEE-8577FDB07820@sarenet.es> In-Reply-To: <CB854F58-03AF-46DD-8153-85FA96037C21@sarenet.es> References: <864468D4-DCE9-493B-9280-00E5FAB2A05C@lassitu.de> <20100309122954.GE3155@garage.freebsd.pl> <EC9BC6B4-8D0E-4FE3-852F-0E3A24569D33@sarenet.es> <20100309125815.GF3155@garage.freebsd.pl> <CB854F58-03AF-46DD-8153-85FA96037C21@sarenet.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 9, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Borja Marcos wrote: >=20 > On Mar 9, 2010, at 1:58 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >=20 >>>> What kind of hardware do you have there? There is 3-way deadlock = I've a >>>> fix for which would be hard to trigger on single or dual core = machines. >>>>=20 >>>> Feel free to try the fix: >>>>=20 >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_3way_deadlock.patch >>>=20 >>> Maybe related to the deadlock I reported when I was receiving an = incremental snapshot while the target dataset was being read? >>=20 >> Could be. This deadlock is in general related to zfs recv = functionality. >=20 > Aye aye, Sir >=20 > set fingers -position crossed >=20 > testing :) Tested. Same deadlock remains. Borja.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BFF1E2D6-B48A-4A5E-ACEE-8577FDB07820>