Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 21:16:09 -0500 From: Antonio Olivares <olivares14031@gmail.com> To: ajtiM <lumiwa@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libxul Message-ID: <CAJ5UdcNkN1FYmP7N9mON6=nkw-Su7q=-rReJZ9i9Kwr5jAgH-g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201208181825.33758.lumiwa@gmail.com> References: <201208181825.33758.lumiwa@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, ajtiM <lumiwa@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > There are vulnerabilities in libxul-1.9.2 very long time and looks like > nothing is better. Are there a new libxul version somewhere to download, > please? > > > > portaudit -Fda > auditfile.tbz 100% of 79 kB 316 kBps > New database installed. > Database created: Sat Aug 18 18:15:04 CDT 2012 > Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 > Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. > Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/dbf338d0-dce5-11e1- > b655-14dae9ebcf89.html > > Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 > Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. > Reference: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/bfecf7c1- > af47-11e1-9580-4061862b8c22.html > > Affected package: libxul-1.9.2.28_1 > Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. > Reference: > http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/380e8c56-8e32-11e1-9580-4061862b8c22.html > > 3 problem(s) in your installed packages found. > > You are advised to update or deinstall the affected package(s) immediately. > Mitja > -------- > http://jpgmag.com/people/lumiwa > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I was wanting to ask this question for a long time, but you have beaten me to it :) I was going to ask specifically if firefox does depend on libxul that it is necessary? Otherwise, why do we have to see this every time we update our ports? I have seen that there's a configuration option for libxul so that it can install, but using portmaster the option is not the same or not present? Anyone want to take a shot at explaining this never ending libxul-* saga? Regards, Antonio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ5UdcNkN1FYmP7N9mON6=nkw-Su7q=-rReJZ9i9Kwr5jAgH-g>