Date: Mon, 17 Mar 1997 17:29:46 -0500 (EST) From: Tim Vanderhoek <tim@X2296> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=AFren?= Schmidt <sos@ravenock.cybercity.dk>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which lists for discussion. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970317172823.178A-100000@X2296> In-Reply-To: <199703171822.LAA07363@rover.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Mar 1997, Warner Losh wrote: > Actually, here's the list > 2.0.x dead > 2.1.x stagnant > 2.2.x stable, by definition Arguably, it's not stable until wcarchive runs it. That could make for an interesting definition of the current -stable: whatever wcarchive is running. -- tIM...HOEk Who's been messing with my anti-paranoi shot?!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970317172823.178A-100000>