Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 16:09:02 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mtree -L is broken due to unneded type=link additions to BSD.*.dist Message-ID: <xzpn05y5sw1.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20040330111059.GA48428@nagual.pp.ru> (Andrey Chernov's message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2004 15:10:59 %2B0400") References: <20040328182314.GA99956@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpisgmwurw.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040330093548.GA46139@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpvfkmvdew.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040330103119.GA47518@nagual.pp.ru> <xzpr7vavc9a.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040330105948.GA48082@nagual.pp.ru> <20040330111059.GA48428@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes:
> Alternatively, do you maybe mean that people directly calls mtree by
> hand before port installing? It is not supported way to get right
> directories in anycase and not worth to broke mtree -L, of course.
So what *is* the supported way to create and populate ${PREFIX}?
and why didn't you protest this change when it was discussed on the
lists? the conclusion of that discussion was "BSD.*.dist doesn't list
symlinks because we thought mtree couldn't handle them"
DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpn05y5sw1.fsf>