Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:24:43 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include stdio.h src/sys/sys vnode.h Message-ID: <200104232024.f3NKOh875408@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 23 Apr 2001 08:41:04 PDT." <XFMail.010423084104.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <XFMail.010423084104.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <XFMail.010423084104.jhb@FreeBSD.org> John Baldwin writes:
: From style(9):
:
: static char *function(int _arg, const char *_arg2, struct foo *_arg3,
: struct bar *_arg4);
: static void usage(void);
:
: Thus it seems that the continuation line for prototypes is to line up the
: second line with the arguments. Perhaps style(9) should be changed, but 4
: space indents for prototype continuation lines isn't style(9) as it is
: currently defined.
That's not my understanding of style(9) or existing practice in
conformant modules. Of course, I see a lot of different continuation
styles in stdio.h:
static char *function(int _arg, const char *_arg2, struct foo *_arg3,
struct bar *_arg4);
static char *function(int _arg, const char *_arg2, struct foo *_arg3,
struct bar *_arg4);
but I am pretty sure that the ( alignment is wrong or accidental.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104232024.f3NKOh875408>