Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Wed, 25 Oct 1995 16:34:54 -0700
From:      "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To:        John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
Cc:        Gary Palmer <gary@palmer.demon.co.uk>, stable@freebsd.org, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Oct 20 snap install... 
Message-ID:  <8031.814664094@time.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Oct 1995 18:18:20 CDT." <Pine.BSF.3.91.951025180953.227B-100000@fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail 

> I don't like the terminology `Active' because if a user does not know the
> difference between active and passive, it does not provide any useful hint
> about which FTP option to use.  Saying just `FTP' and `Passive FTP' gives
> an obvious, and probably correct, choice to users who don't know what
> `Passive FTP' means. 

I'm inclined to agree, actually.  It always struck me as awkward the
way it was worded before.  Changed!

					Jordan
home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8031.814664094>