Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2015/freebsd-net/20150823.freebsd-net

Messages: 100, new messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:18:55 2023

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Aug 22 Hiroki Sato                Re: a couple /etc/rc.firewall questions
  2. Aug 22 Don Lewis                  a couple /etc/rc.firewall questions
  3. Aug 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 200379] SCTP stack is not FIB aware
  4. Aug 22 Rick Macklem               Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance
  5. Aug 22 Daniel Braniss             Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance
  6. Aug 21 Rick Macklem               Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance
  7. Aug 21 aurfalien                  Re: Mellanox 40Gb support
  8. Aug 21 Julian Elischer            Re: Mellanox 40Gb support
  9. Aug 21 aurfalien                  Re: Mellanox 40Gb support
 10. Aug 21 Julian Elischer            Re: Mellanox 40Gb support
 11. Aug 21 aurfalien                  Re: Mellanox 40Gb support
 12. Aug 21 Andriy Gapon               Re: pf and new interface
 13. Aug 20 K. Macy                    Re: Mellanox 40Gb support
 14. Aug 20 aurfalien                  Mellanox 40Gb support
 15. Aug 20 Mark Felder                Re: RFC7084 "Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers"
 16. Aug 20 Rick Macklem               Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance
 17. Aug 20 Gleb Smirnoff              Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance
 18. Aug 20 Yonghyeon PYUN             Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance
 19. Aug 20 Yonghyeon PYUN             Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance
 20. Aug 19 John Nielsen               Re: RFC7084 "Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers"


21. Aug 19 Rick Macklem Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 22. Aug 19 Eric Joyner Re: FreeBSD 10.2-STABLE + Intel XL710 - free queues 23. Aug 19 David Wolfskill Re: Panic [page fault] in _ieee80211_crypto_delkey(): stable/10/amd64 @r286878 24. Aug 19 Adrian Chadd Re: FreeBSD 10.2-STABLE + Intel XL710 - free queues 25. Aug 19 Evgeny Khorokhorin Re: FreeBSD 10.2-STABLE + Intel XL710 - free queues 26. Aug 19 Adrian Chadd Re: FreeBSD 10.2-STABLE + Intel XL710 - free queues 27. Aug 19 Adrian Chadd Re: Panic [page fault] in _ieee80211_crypto_delkey(): stable/10/amd64 @r286878 28. Aug 19 Eric Joyner Re: FreeBSD 10.2-STABLE + Intel XL710 - free queues 29. Aug 19 hiren panchasara Re: FreeBSD 10.2-STABLE + Intel XL710 - free queues 30. Aug 19 David Wolfskill Re: Panic [page fault] in _ieee80211_crypto_delkey(): stable/10/amd64 @r286878 31. Aug 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201428] Possible Memory leak in Netmap 32. Aug 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 202351] [ip6] [panic] Kernel panic in ip6_forward (different from 128247, 131038) 33. Aug 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 202484] vtnet drivers didn't support being use for multicast routing (MRT_ADD_VIF) 34. Aug 19 Evgeny Khorokhorin FreeBSD 10.2-STABLE + Intel XL710 - free queues 35. Aug 19 Daniel Braniss Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 36. Aug 19 Rick Macklem Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 37. Aug 19 Rick Macklem Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 38. Aug 19 Rick Macklem Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 39. Aug 19 Rick Macklem Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 40. Aug 19 Yonghyeon PYUN Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance
41. Aug 19 Hans Petter Selasky Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 42. Aug 19 Hans Petter Selasky Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 43. Aug 19 Yonghyeon PYUN Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 44. Aug 19 Yonghyeon PYUN Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 45. Aug 19 Hans Petter Selasky Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 46. Aug 19 Rick Macklem Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 47. Aug 18 David Wolfskill Panic [page fault] in _ieee80211_crypto_delkey(): stable/10/amd64 @r286878 48. Aug 18 Rick Macklem Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 49. Aug 18 Rick Macklem Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 50. Aug 18 hiren panchasara Re: Poor high-PPS performance of the 10G ixgbe(9) NIC/driver in FreeBSD 10.1 51. Aug 18 hiren panchasara Re: Poor high-PPS performance of the 10G ixgbe(9) NIC/driver in FreeBSD 10.1 52. Aug 18 Andriy Gapon Re: pf and new interface 53. Aug 18 Glen Barber Re: Poor high-PPS performance of the 10G ixgbe(9) NIC/driver in FreeBSD 10.1 54. Aug 18 Reko Turja Re: pf and new interface 55. Aug 18 Adrian Chadd Re: Poor high-PPS performance of the 10G ixgbe(9) NIC/driver in FreeBSD 10.1 56. Aug 18 Maxim Sobolev Re: Poor high-PPS performance of the 10G ixgbe(9) NIC/driver in FreeBSD 10.1 57. Aug 18 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 58. Aug 18 Daniel Braniss Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 59. Aug 18 Hans Petter Selasky Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 60. Aug 18 Hans Petter Selasky Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance
61. Aug 18 Rick Macklem Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 62. Aug 18 Andriy Gapon Re: pf and new interface 63. Aug 18 wishmaster Re[2]: pf and new interface 64. Aug 18 Andriy Gapon Re: pf and new interface 65. Aug 18 wishmaster Re: pf and new interface 66. Aug 18 Andriy Gapon pf and new interface 67. Aug 18 Daniel Braniss Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 68. Aug 18 Alexander V. Chernikov Re: Panic with recent -CURRENT 69. Aug 17 Xin Li Panic with recent -CURRENT 70. Aug 17 Rick Macklem Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 71. Aug 17 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 200323] BPF userland misuse can crash the system 72. Aug 17 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 200323] BPF userland misuse can crash the system 73. Aug 17 Maxim Sobolev Re: Poor high-PPS performance of the 10G ixgbe(9) NIC/driver in FreeBSD 10.1 74. Aug 17 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 75. Aug 17 Alban Hertroys Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 76. Aug 17 Daniel Braniss Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 77. Aug 17 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 78. Aug 17 Rick Macklem Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 79. Aug 17 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 80. Aug 17 Alban Hertroys Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance
81. Aug 17 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 82. Aug 17 Gary Palmer RFC7084 "Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers" 83. Aug 17 Daniel Braniss Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 84. Aug 17 Christopher Forgeron Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 85. Aug 17 Daniel Braniss Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 86. Aug 17 Slawa Olhovchenkov Re: ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 87. Aug 17 Emeric POUPON IPsec: question on the sysctl preferred_oldsa 88. Aug 17 Daniel Braniss ix(intel) vs mlxen(mellanox) 10Gb performance 89. Aug 16 bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.o Problem reports for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention 90. Aug 16 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 195078] em tx_dma_fails and dropped packets 91. Aug 16 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 199174] em tx and rx hang 92. Aug 16 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 200221] em0 watchdog timeout under load 93. Aug 16 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 161277] [em] [patch] BMC cannot receive IPMI traffic after loading or enabling the if_em driver 94. Aug 16 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 161277] [em] [patch] BMC cannot receive IPMI traffic after loading or enabling the if_em driver 95. Aug 16 James Lott Re: Ethernet tunneling options under FreeBSD 96. Aug 16 James Lott Re: Ethernet tunneling options under FreeBSD 97. Aug 16 Julian Elischer Re: Ethernet tunneling options under FreeBSD 98. Aug 16 Julian Elischer Re: Ethernet tunneling options under FreeBSD 99. Aug 16 Kim Culhan Re: RE not working on 10.2-RELEASE #0 r286731M 100. Aug 16 Yonghyeon PYUN Re: RE not working on 10.2-RELEASE #0 r286731M


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date