2016/freebsd-net/20160124.freebsd-net
Messages: 79, sorted by subject
|
Last page update: Sat Jan 3 13:11:27 UTC 2026
|
|
home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date
1. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 196252] [patch] show tcp hostcache usage in netstat -s -p tcp 2. Jan 17 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 3. Jan 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 4. Jan 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 5. Jan 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 6. Jan 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 7. Jan 20 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206368] [PATCH] kevent doesn't notify EV_ENABLE-ed events 8. Jan 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206456] pkt-gen unable work with three interfaces simultaneously in my freebsd system 9. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2 10. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2 11. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2 12. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2 13. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 14. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 15. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 16. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 17. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 18. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 19. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendmsg(2) (maybe sendto(2) as well) will fail with EINVAL; isn't documented in manpage 20. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendmsg(2) (sendto(2) too?) can fail with EINVAL; isn't documented in manpage
21. Jan 19 Garrett Wollman Another issue with ixl(4) with netmap 22. Jan 19 Luigi Rizzo Re: Another issue with ixl(4) with netmap 23. Jan 20 Teleric Team Chelsio cxl and ncxl interface, whats the difference? 24. Jan 20 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio cxl and ncxl interface, whats the difference? 25. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 26. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 27. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 28. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 29. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 30. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 31. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 32. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 33. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 34. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 35. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 36. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 37. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 38. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 39. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 40. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX
41. Jan 17 Jilles Tjoelker Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 42. Jan 17 Jilles Tjoelker Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 43. Jan 18 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 44. Jan 18 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 45. Jan 18 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 46. Jan 19 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 47. Jan 19 Jilles Tjoelker Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 48. Jan 19 Mark Delany Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 49. Jan 20 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 50. Jan 20 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 51. Jan 20 Bruce Evans Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 52. Jan 20 Dmitry Chagin Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 53. Jan 21 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 54. Jan 21 Bruce Evans Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 55. Jan 22 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 56. Jan 19 Gerrit Kühn ix hangs (almost) 57. Jan 23 Ben Woods Multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current 58. Jan 20 Eduardo Meyer netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 59. Jan 20 Pavel Odintsov Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 60. Jan 20 Adrian Chadd Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD
61. Jan 23 Pavel Odintsov Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 62. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 63. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 64. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 65. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 66. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 67. Jan 23 Eduardo Meyer Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 68. Jan 19 Mathur, Vedant Performing a socket accept in listen sockets' upcall - Yes or No? 69. Jan 18 Andreas Longwitz pf not seeing inbound packets coming from IPSec on epair interface 70. Jan 18 Bjoern A. Zeeb Re: pf not seeing inbound packets coming from IPSec on epair interface 71. Jan 18 Andreas Longwitz Re: pf not seeing inbound packets coming from IPSec on epair interface 72. Jan 20 Matthew Grooms pf state disappearing 73. Jan 21 Nick Rogers Re: pf state disappearing 74. Jan 21 Matthew Grooms Re: pf state disappearing [ adaptive timeout bug ] 75. Jan 22 Nick Rogers Re: pf state disappearing [ adaptive timeout bug ] 76. Jan 22 Matthew Grooms Re: pf state disappearing [ adaptive timeout bug ] 77. Jan 17 bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.o Problem reports for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention 78. Jan 21 Alexander V. Chernikov projects/routing announcement/status 79. Jan 21 Attila Balogh RB1100 network detection
home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date