2016/freebsd-net/20160124.freebsd-net
Messages: 79, sorted by author
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:18:56 2023
|
|
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 2. Jan 20 Adrian Chadd Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 3. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 4. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 5. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 6. Jan 21 Alexander V. Chernikov projects/routing announcement/status 7. Jan 18 Andreas Longwitz Re: pf not seeing inbound packets coming from IPSec on epair interface 8. Jan 18 Andreas Longwitz pf not seeing inbound packets coming from IPSec on epair interface 9. Jan 21 Attila Balogh RB1100 network detection 10. Jan 23 Ben Woods Multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current 11. Jan 18 Bjoern A. Zeeb Re: pf not seeing inbound packets coming from IPSec on epair interface 12. Jan 18 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 13. Jan 19 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 14. Jan 20 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 15. Jan 22 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 16. Jan 20 Bruce Evans Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 17. Jan 21 Bruce Evans Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 18. Jan 20 Dmitry Chagin Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 19. Jan 23 Eduardo Meyer Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 20. Jan 20 Eduardo Meyer netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD
21. Jan 19 Garrett Wollman Another issue with ixl(4) with netmap 22. Jan 19 Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FC ix hangs (almost) 23. Jan 17 Jilles Tjoelker Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 24. Jan 17 Jilles Tjoelker Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 25. Jan 19 Jilles Tjoelker Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 26. Jan 18 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 27. Jan 18 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 28. Jan 20 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 29. Jan 21 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 30. Jan 19 Luigi Rizzo Re: Another issue with ixl(4) with netmap 31. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 32. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 33. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 34. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 35. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 36. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 37. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 38. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 39. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 40. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX
41. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 42. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 43. Jan 19 Mark Delany Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 44. Jan 19 Mathur, Vedant Performing a socket accept in listen sockets' upcall - Yes or No? 45. Jan 21 Matthew Grooms Re: pf state disappearing [ adaptive timeout bug ] 46. Jan 22 Matthew Grooms Re: pf state disappearing [ adaptive timeout bug ] 47. Jan 20 Matthew Grooms pf state disappearing 48. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 49. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 50. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 51. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 52. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 53. Jan 20 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio cxl and ncxl interface, whats the difference? 54. Jan 21 Nick Rogers Re: pf state disappearing 55. Jan 22 Nick Rogers Re: pf state disappearing [ adaptive timeout bug ] 56. Jan 20 Pavel Odintsov Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 57. Jan 23 Pavel Odintsov Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 58. Jan 20 Teleric Team Chelsio cxl and ncxl interface, whats the difference? 59. Jan 17 bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.o Problem reports for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention 60. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 196252] [patch] show tcp hostcache usage in netstat -s -p tcp
61. Jan 17 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 62. Jan 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 63. Jan 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 64. Jan 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 65. Jan 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 66. Jan 20 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206368] [PATCH] kevent doesn't notify EV_ENABLE-ed events 67. Jan 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206456] pkt-gen unable work with three interfaces simultaneously in my freebsd system 68. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2 69. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2 70. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2 71. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2 72. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 73. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 74. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 75. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 76. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 77. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 78. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendmsg(2) (maybe sendto(2) as well) will fail with EINVAL; isn't documented in manpage 79. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendmsg(2) (sendto(2) too?) can fail with EINVAL; isn't documented in manpage
home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date