Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2016/freebsd-net/20160124.freebsd-net

Messages: 79, old messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:18:56 2023

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Jan 17 bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.o Problem reports for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention
  2. Jan 17 Jilles Tjoelker            Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls?
  3. Jan 17 Jilles Tjoelker            Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls?
  4. Jan 17 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails
  5. Jan 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails
  6. Jan 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails
  7. Jan 18 Konstantin Belousov        Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls?
  8. Jan 18 Boris Astardzhiev          Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls?
  9. Jan 18 Konstantin Belousov        Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls?
 10. Jan 18 Andreas Longwitz           pf not seeing inbound packets coming from IPSec on epair interface
 11. Jan 18 Bjoern A. Zeeb             Re: pf not seeing inbound packets coming from IPSec on epair interface
 12. Jan 18 Andreas Longwitz           Re: pf not seeing inbound packets coming from IPSec on epair interface
 13. Jan 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails
 14. Jan 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails
 15. Jan 19 Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FC ix hangs (almost)
 16. Jan 19 Boris Astardzhiev          Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls?
 17. Jan 19 Jilles Tjoelker            Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls?
 18. Jan 19 Mark Delany                Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls?
 19. Jan 19 Mathur, Vedant             Performing a socket accept in listen sockets' upcall - Yes or No?
 20. Jan 19 Garrett Wollman            Another issue with ixl(4) with netmap


21. Jan 19 Luigi Rizzo Re: Another issue with ixl(4) with netmap 22. Jan 20 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 23. Jan 20 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206368] [PATCH] kevent doesn't notify EV_ENABLE-ed events 24. Jan 20 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 25. Jan 20 Bruce Evans Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 26. Jan 20 Dmitry Chagin Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 27. Jan 20 Eduardo Meyer netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 28. Jan 20 Teleric Team Chelsio cxl and ncxl interface, whats the difference? 29. Jan 20 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio cxl and ncxl interface, whats the difference? 30. Jan 20 Pavel Odintsov Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 31. Jan 20 Adrian Chadd Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 32. Jan 20 Matthew Grooms pf state disappearing 33. Jan 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206456] pkt-gen unable work with three interfaces simultaneously in my freebsd system 34. Jan 21 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 35. Jan 21 Attila Balogh RB1100 network detection 36. Jan 21 Bruce Evans Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 37. Jan 21 Nick Rogers Re: pf state disappearing 38. Jan 21 Matthew Grooms Re: pf state disappearing [ adaptive timeout bug ] 39. Jan 21 Alexander V. Chernikov projects/routing announcement/status 40. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2
41. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 196252] [patch] show tcp hostcache usage in netstat -s -p tcp 42. Jan 22 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 43. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2 44. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2 45. Jan 22 Nick Rogers Re: pf state disappearing [ adaptive timeout bug ] 46. Jan 22 Matthew Grooms Re: pf state disappearing [ adaptive timeout bug ] 47. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 48. Jan 23 Pavel Odintsov Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 49. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 50. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 51. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 52. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 53. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 54. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 55. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 56. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2 57. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 58. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 59. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 60. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX
61. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 62. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 63. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 64. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 65. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 66. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 67. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 68. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 69. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 70. Jan 23 Eduardo Meyer Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 71. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 72. Jan 23 Ben Woods Multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current 73. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 74. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 75. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 76. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 77. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 78. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendmsg(2) (maybe sendto(2) as well) will fail with EINVAL; isn't documented in manpage 79. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendmsg(2) (sendto(2) too?) can fail with EINVAL; isn't documented in manpage


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date