Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2016/freebsd-net/20160124.freebsd-net

Messages: 79, new messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:18:56 2023

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendmsg(2) (sendto(2) too?) can fail with EINVAL; isn't documented in manpage
  2. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendmsg(2) (maybe sendto(2) as well) will fail with EINVAL; isn't documented in manpage
  3. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 
  4. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 
  5. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 
  6. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 
  7. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206544] sendit "KPI" (in reality sendmsg(2); maybe sendto(2)) will fail with EINVAL if mp->msg_control != NULL and mp->msg_controllen is 
  8. Jan 23 Ben Woods                  Multicast routing on FreeBSD 11 current
  9. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar             Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX
 10. Jan 23 Eduardo Meyer              Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD
 11. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo                Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD
 12. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd               Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD
 13. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd               Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD
 14. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti            Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD
 15. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar             Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX
 16. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti            Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX
 17. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo                Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX
 18. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar             Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX
 19. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo                Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX
 20. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti            Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX


21. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 22. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 23. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 24. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2 25. Jan 23 Luigi Rizzo Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 26. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 27. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 28. Jan 23 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206528] Emulex LPe 16002 FC HBA Not Recognized by oce(4) driver 29. Jan 23 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 30. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 31. Jan 23 Adrian Chadd Re: Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 32. Jan 23 Pavel Odintsov Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 33. Jan 23 Marcus Cenzatti Chelsio T520-SO-CR low performance (netmap tested) for RX 34. Jan 22 Matthew Grooms Re: pf state disappearing [ adaptive timeout bug ] 35. Jan 22 Nick Rogers Re: pf state disappearing [ adaptive timeout bug ] 36. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2 37. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2 38. Jan 22 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 39. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 196252] [patch] show tcp hostcache usage in netstat -s -p tcp 40. Jan 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206478] Setting laggproto fails on 10.2
41. Jan 21 Alexander V. Chernikov projects/routing announcement/status 42. Jan 21 Matthew Grooms Re: pf state disappearing [ adaptive timeout bug ] 43. Jan 21 Nick Rogers Re: pf state disappearing 44. Jan 21 Bruce Evans Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 45. Jan 21 Attila Balogh RB1100 network detection 46. Jan 21 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 47. Jan 21 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206456] pkt-gen unable work with three interfaces simultaneously in my freebsd system 48. Jan 20 Matthew Grooms pf state disappearing 49. Jan 20 Adrian Chadd Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 50. Jan 20 Pavel Odintsov Re: netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 51. Jan 20 Navdeep Parhar Re: Chelsio cxl and ncxl interface, whats the difference? 52. Jan 20 Teleric Team Chelsio cxl and ncxl interface, whats the difference? 53. Jan 20 Eduardo Meyer netmap design question - accessing netmap:X-n individual queues on FreeBSD 54. Jan 20 Dmitry Chagin Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 55. Jan 20 Bruce Evans Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 56. Jan 20 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 57. Jan 20 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 206368] [PATCH] kevent doesn't notify EV_ENABLE-ed events 58. Jan 20 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 59. Jan 19 Luigi Rizzo Re: Another issue with ixl(4) with netmap 60. Jan 19 Garrett Wollman Another issue with ixl(4) with netmap
61. Jan 19 Mathur, Vedant Performing a socket accept in listen sockets' upcall - Yes or No? 62. Jan 19 Mark Delany Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 63. Jan 19 Jilles Tjoelker Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 64. Jan 19 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 65. Jan 19 Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FC ix hangs (almost) 66. Jan 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 67. Jan 19 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 68. Jan 18 Andreas Longwitz Re: pf not seeing inbound packets coming from IPSec on epair interface 69. Jan 18 Bjoern A. Zeeb Re: pf not seeing inbound packets coming from IPSec on epair interface 70. Jan 18 Andreas Longwitz pf not seeing inbound packets coming from IPSec on epair interface 71. Jan 18 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 72. Jan 18 Boris Astardzhiev Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 73. Jan 18 Konstantin Belousov Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 74. Jan 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 75. Jan 18 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 76. Jan 17 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails 77. Jan 17 Jilles Tjoelker Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 78. Jan 17 Jilles Tjoelker Re: Does FreeBSD have sendmmsg or recvmmsg system calls? 79. Jan 17 bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.o Problem reports for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date