Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2012/freebsd-hackers/20120219.freebsd-hackers

Messages: 119, sorted by subject
Last page update: Sat Jan 3 13:09:58 UTC 2026

home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date
  1. Feb 16 Alex Goncharov             8 to 9: A longer wait early in the boot of a (damaged) Compaq Presario
  2. Feb 16 Alex Goncharov              Re: 8 to 9: A longer wait early in the boot of a (damaged) Compaq Presario
  3. Feb 16 Rares Aioanei               Re: 8 to 9: A longer wait early in the boot of a (damaged) Compaq Presario
  4. Feb 17 Uffe Jakobsen               Re: 8 to 9: A longer wait early in the boot of a (damaged) Compaq Presario
  5. Feb 16 Steven Hartland            Re: 8 to 9: A longer wait early in the boot of a (damaged) CompaqPresario
  6. Feb 17 Alex Goncharov              Re: 8 to 9: A longer wait early in the boot of a (damaged) CompaqPresario
  7. Feb 17 Alex Goncharov             8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
  8. Feb 17 Hans Petter Selasky         Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
  9. Feb 17 matt                        Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 10. Feb 17 Alex Goncharov              Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 11. Feb 17 Freddie Cash                Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 12. Feb 17 Alex Goncharov              Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 13. Feb 17 Alexander Motin             Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 14. Feb 17 Alex Goncharov              Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 15. Feb 17 Alexander Motin             Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 16. Feb 17 Alex Goncharov              Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 17. Feb 17 Alexander Motin             Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 18. Feb 17 Alex Goncharov              Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 19. Feb 17 matt                        Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 20. Feb 17 Alex Goncharov              Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?

 21. Feb 17 matt                        Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 22. Feb 17 Alex Goncharov              Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 23. Feb 17 rank1seeker@gmail.com       Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 24. Feb 17 Alex Goncharov              Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 25. Feb 17 matt                        Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 26. Feb 18 Julian Elischer             Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 27. Feb 18 Doug Barton                 Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 28. Feb 18 matt                        Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 29. Feb 18 matt                        Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 30. Feb 18 Alex Goncharov              Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 31. Feb 18 perryh@pluto.rain.com       Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 32. Feb 18 Adrian Chadd                Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 33. Feb 18 Alex Goncharov              Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 34. Feb 18 b. f.                       Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 35. Feb 18 Adrian Chadd                Re: 8 to 9: Kernel modularization -- did it change?
 36. Feb 14 rank1seeker@gmail.com      9.0 observations
 37. Feb 13 Alexander Motin            Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
 38. Feb 13 Jeff Roberson               Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
 39. Feb 13 Alexander Motin             Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
 40. Feb 13 Jeff Roberson               Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only

 41. Feb 13 Alexander Motin             Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
 42. Feb 15 Alexander Motin             Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
 43. Feb 15 Alexander Motin             Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
 44. Feb 15 Jeff Roberson               Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
 45. Feb 16 Alexander Motin             Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
 46. Feb 16 Alexander Motin             Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
 47. Feb 16 Alexander Motin             Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
 48. Feb 16 Florian Smeets              Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
 49. Feb 17 Alexander Motin             Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
 50. Feb 17 Arnaud Lacombe              Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
 51. Feb 17 Alexander Motin             Re: [RFT][patch] Scheduling for HTT and not only
 52. Feb 13 Caza, Aaron                AHCI Timeouts on SATA III with Intel 520 SSDs
 53. Feb 15 Ɓukasz Kurek               Re: backup BIOS settings
 54. Feb 17 rank1seeker@gmail.com      BUG: 9.0 stage 2 boot (/boot/boot)
 55. Feb 18 Andriy Gapon               callouts precision
 56. Feb 18 Alexander Motin             Re: callouts precision
 57. Feb 18 Andriy Gapon                Re: callouts precision
 58. Feb 15 Eric McCorkle              CUDA porting effort?
 59. Feb 17 Super Bisquit               Re: CUDA porting effort?
 60. Feb 17 Oliver Pinter               Re: CUDA porting effort?

 61. Feb 17 vermaden                   devd based AUTOMOUNTER
 62. Feb 17 matt                        Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER
 63. Feb 17 vermaden                    Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER
 64. Feb 17 vermaden                    Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER
 65. Feb 17 vermaden                    Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER
 66. Feb 18 vermaden                    Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER
 67. Feb 18 Hans Petter Selasky         Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER
 68. Feb 18 Uffe Jakobsen               Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER
 69. Feb 18 Gleb Kurtsou                Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER
 70. Feb 18 Lars Engels                 Re: devd based AUTOMOUNTER
 71. Feb 18 Mark Linimon               Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle
 72. Feb 18 Super Bisquit               Re: FreeBSD has serious problems with focus, longevity, and lifecycle
 73. Feb 15 Ansar Mohammed             Re: Kerberos and FreeBSD
 74. Feb 17 Benjamin Kaduk              Re: Kerberos and FreeBSD
 75. Feb 15 Bernard van Gastel         memmem small optimalisation
 76. Feb 15 Andrey Simonenko            Re: memmem small optimalisation
 77. Feb 15 Ansar Mohammed             nologin size
 78. Feb 15 Ansar Mohammed              Re: nologin size
 79. Feb 15 Devin Teske                 RE: nologin size
 80. Feb 15 Xin Li                      Re: nologin size

 81. Feb 15 Simon                       Re: nologin size
 82. Feb 17 Jason Hellenthal            Re: nologin size
 83. Feb 13 Stephen Sanders            Odd RAID Performance Issue
 84. Feb 13 Tom Evans                   Re: Odd RAID Performance Issue
 85. Feb 13 Ivan Voras                  Re: Odd RAID Performance Issue
 86. Feb 14 Maninya M                  OS support for fault tolerance
 87. Feb 14 Julian Elischer             Re: OS support for fault tolerance
 88. Feb 14 Jason Hellenthal            Re: OS support for fault tolerance
 89. Feb 14 mdf@FreeBSD.org             Re: OS support for fault tolerance
 90. Feb 14 Joshua Isom                 Re: OS support for fault tolerance
 91. Feb 14 Brandon Falk                Re: OS support for fault tolerance
 92. Feb 14 Rayson Ho                   Re: OS support for fault tolerance
 93. Feb 14 Eitan Adler                 Re: OS support for fault tolerance
 94. Feb 14 Uffe Jakobsen               Re: OS support for fault tolerance
 95. Feb 14 Julian Elischer             Re: OS support for fault tolerance
 96. Feb 14 Jan Mikkelsen               Re: OS support for fault tolerance
 97. Feb 15 Devin Teske                 RE: OS support for fault tolerance
 98. Feb 15 Rayson Ho                   Re: OS support for fault tolerance
 99. Feb 15 Jim Bryant                  Re: OS support for fault tolerance
100. Feb 15 Jim Bryant                  Re: OS support for fault tolerance

101. Feb 15 Julian Elischer             Re: OS support for fault tolerance
102. Feb 14 Rayson Ho                  Re: OS support for fault tolerance (re-send)
103. Feb 16 Vijay Singh                Re: Panic in 8.1 in softclock(): mutex Giant not owned at ../../../../sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:185
104. Feb 16 Arnaud Lacombe              Re: Panic in 8.1 in softclock(): mutex Giant not owned at ../../../../sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:185
105. Feb 16 Vijay Singh                 Re: Panic in 8.1 in softclock(): mutex Giant not owned at ../../../../sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:185
106. Feb 17 Ryan Stone                  Re: Panic in 8.1 in softclock(): mutex Giant not owned at ../../../../sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:185
107. Feb 17 Ryan Stone                  Re: Panic in 8.1 in softclock(): mutex Giant not owned at ../../../../sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:185
108. Feb 14 _                          quick question regarding libarchive
109. Feb 18 Yuri                       Why /dev/dsp can get into "Device busy" state?
110. Feb 14 Matthew Story              xargs short-circuit
111. Feb 14 Matthew Story               Re: xargs short-circuit
112. Feb 14 Devin Teske                 RE: xargs short-circuit
113. Feb 14 Matthew Story               Re: xargs short-circuit
114. Feb 14 Devin Teske                 RE: xargs short-circuit
115. Feb 14 Jilles Tjoelker             Re: xargs short-circuit
116. Feb 14 Matthew Story               Re: xargs short-circuit
117. Feb 14 Matthew Story               Re: xargs short-circuit
118. Feb 14 Jos Backus                  Re: xargs short-circuit
119. Feb 18 Matthew Story               Re: xargs short-circuit

home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date