Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2012/freebsd-ports/20121014.freebsd-ports

Messages: 133, new messages first
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:21:48 2023

home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Oct 13 David Wolfskill            Re: The xpdf binary is MIA with xpdf-3.03_2
  2. Oct 13 Warren Block               Re: The xpdf binary is MIA with xpdf-3.03_2
  3. Oct 13 Bob Willcox                The xpdf binary is MIA with xpdf-3.03_2
  4. Oct 13 Niclas Zeising             Re: graphics/png status, when will 1.5.13 appear in ports?
  5. Oct 13 Thomas Mueller             graphics/png status, when will 1.5.13 appear in ports?
  6. Oct 13 matt                       Re: [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has been committed
  7. Oct 12 Christer Solskogen         VirtualBox dead slow
  8. Oct 12 Halmpellets                straw pellets for horse bedding
  9. Oct 12 Brett                      Local portsdir_path
 10. Oct 12 Claude Buisson             Re: [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has been committed
 11. Oct 12 Miroslav Kokrda            help
 12. Oct 12 Barbara                    Re: FF 16 taken offline
 13. Oct 12 Online Sales Events        Overcome the Budget/Price Objection Webinar
 14. Oct 12 matt                       Re: [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has been committed
 15. Oct 12 Robert Backhaus            net-p2p/bitcoin: How much of this sed script is actually required?
 16. Oct 12 Robert Backhaus            net-p2p/bitcoin: How much of this sed script is actually required?
 17. Oct 11 Jeremy Messenger           Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk
 18. Oct 11 Kevin Oberman              Re: pkgng: perl5.12/perl5.14 conflict
 19. Oct 11 Data Studio                =?ISO-8859-1?Q?DATA_STUDIO_-_EST=DADIO_DE_GRAVA=C7=C3O_DE_BANDAS, _JINGLES_E_SPOTS_PUBLICIT=C1RIOS.?=
 20. Oct 11 Simon L. B. Nielsen        Re: svn: E175002: REPORT of '/ports/!svn/me': Could not send request: Operation not permitted (http://svn.freebsd.org)


21. Oct 11 poeskunt69@yahoo.com I'm too shy to do this any other way. 22. Oct 11 Florian Smeets Re: FF 16 taken offline 23. Oct 11 Barbara FF 16 taken offline 24. Oct 11 Bruce Cran Re: pkgng: perl5.12/perl5.14 conflict 25. Oct 11 Baptiste Daroussin Re: pkgng: perl5.12/perl5.14 conflict 26. Oct 11 Bruce Cran pkgng: perl5.12/perl5.14 conflict 27. Oct 11 PC Mart Sdn Bhd (374159-W) Employee Leave Management System For UBS Payroll 28. Oct 10 Thomas Abthorpe [HEADS UP] Ports Feature Freeze for 9.1 29. Oct 10 Chris Rees Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 30. Oct 10 Mark Linimon Re: Fwd: ports/172559: ports/sysutils/apcupsd failed to build in i386 machine with USB driver enabled 31. Oct 10 Mark Linimon Re: [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has been committed 32. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 33. Oct 10 Victor Balada Diaz Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 34. Oct 10 Alexander Un Re: _PKGTOOLSDEFIED 35. Oct 10 Matthew Seaman Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 36. Oct 10 Bruce Cran Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 37. Oct 10 Matthew Seaman Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 38. Oct 10 A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 39. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 40. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng
41. Oct 10 Victor Balada Diaz Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 42. Oct 10 O. Hartmann svn: E175002: REPORT of '/ports/!svn/me': Could not send request: Operation not permitted (http://svn.freebsd.org) 43. Oct 10 Jeremy Messenger Re: MATE 'base' desktop is ready for anyone to test it. 44. Oct 10 Michael Gmelin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 45. Oct 10 Michael Gmelin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 46. Oct 10 Eitan Adler Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 47. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 48. Oct 10 Jeremy Messenger Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 49. Oct 10 Jeremy Messenger Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 50. Oct 10 Michael Gmelin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 51. Oct 10 Simon L. B. Nielsen Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 52. Oct 10 Niclas Zeising Re: _PKGTOOLSDEFIED 53. Oct 10 Jeffrey Bouquet Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 54. Oct 10 Chris Rees Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 55. Oct 10 Christian de Freitas Sant' FreeBSD Port: zenoss-3.1.0_1 56. Oct 10 Alexander Un _PKGTOOLSDEFIED 57. Oct 10 Roman Divacky Re: [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has been committed 58. Oct 10 Michael Gmelin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 59. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 60. Oct 10 Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZ Re: General usefulness of option descriptions
61. Oct 10 Glen Barber Re: [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 62. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin [HEADSUP] IPV6 on by default 63. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin [HEADSUP] current switched by default to pkgng 64. Oct 10 Alexey Kouznetsov Fwd: ports/172559: ports/sysutils/apcupsd failed to build in i386 machine with USB driver enabled 65. Oct 10 Michael Gmelin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 66. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 67. Oct 10 Michael Gmelin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 68. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: java diablo-jdk 69. Oct 10 Yasuhiro KIMURA Re: ports/171413: [PATCH] japanese/mecab: update to 0.994 70. Oct 10 Baptiste Daroussin Re: HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 71. Oct 10 Michael Gmelin HAVE_GNOME vs. bsd.ports.options.mk 72. Oct 10 Michael Reifenberger Re: OPTIONSNG and batch compiling 73. Oct 10 Guido Falsi Re: OPTIONSNG and batch compiling 74. Oct 10 Claude Buisson Re: [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has been committed 75. Oct 10 Michael Reifenberger OPTIONSNG and batch compiling 76. Oct 10 <NotaFiscalEletrônica@mail Nota Fiscal Eletrônica 77. Oct 10 Robert Backhaus net-p2p/bitcoin: How much of this sed script is actually required? 78. Oct 10 jessaic Re:made glass mosaic/sample provider 79. Oct 10 Mark Linimon [HEADSUP] FYI: patch to ports that do not build with clang has been committed 80. Oct 10 Jung-uk Kim Re: java diablo-jdk
81. Oct 9 Baptiste Daroussin Re: future of packages? 82. Oct 9 Patrick Lamaiziere future of packages? 83. Oct 9 Patrick Lamaiziere java diablo-jdk 84. Oct 9 Sales Coach The Five Steps to becoming a Sales Superstar 85. Oct 9 olli hauer Re: help wanted: ports for the Netmagis software 86. Oct 9 Volodymyr Kostyrko Re: ports for Oracle and DB2 database servers 87. Oct 9 Egidijus Paliulis ports for Oracle and DB2 database servers 88. Oct 9 Pierre DAVID help wanted: ports for the Netmagis software 89. Oct 9 sales@secuv.us 7 Inch Digital All in One 4 & 8CH LCD DVR 90. Oct 8 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov Difference in databases/firebird25-client built as root and as unprivileged user 91. Oct 8 Bryan Drewery Re: sysutils/ntfsprogs: problem with GNOMEVFS2 92. Oct 8 Andriy Gapon Re: pkgng: lcms2-2.4 conflicts with lcms-1.19_1,1 93. Oct 8 O. Hartmann Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 94. Oct 8 Oliver Heesakkers Re: pkgng: lcms2-2.4 conflicts with lcms-1.19_1,1 95. Oct 8 =?UTF-8?B?0JHQvtGA0LjRgSDQ Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 96. Oct 8 Kimmo Paasiala Re: pkgng: lcms2-2.4 conflicts with lcms-1.19_1,1 97. Oct 8 Andriy Gapon pkgng: lcms2-2.4 conflicts with lcms-1.19_1,1 98. Oct 8 O. Hartmann Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 99. Oct 8 Max Khon Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 100. Oct 8 O. Hartmann Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- -
101. Oct 8 Kurt Jaeger Re: sysutils/ntfsprogs: problem with GNOMEVFS2 102. Oct 8 =?UTF-8?B?0JHQvtGA0LjRgSDQ Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 103. Oct 8 Andriy Gapon sysutils/ntfsprogs: problem with GNOMEVFS2 104. Oct 8 =?UTF-8?B?0JHQvtGA0LjRgSDQ Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 105. Oct 8 =?UTF-8?B?0JHQvtGA0LjRgSDQ Re: databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 106. Oct 8 O. Hartmann databases/pgadmin3: make: illegal option -- - 107. Oct 8 FreeBSD bugmaster Current problem reports assigned to ports@FreeBSD.org 108. Oct 8 FreeBSD bugmaster Current unassigned ports problem reports 109. Oct 8 Chris Rees Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ? 110. Oct 8 Chris Rees Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ? 111. Oct 8 Thomas Mueller Re: Building Ports: Is there a "make" equivalent for --batch ? 112. Oct 8 V2 by J.Magnani Secure private transactions, for all commodities. 113. Oct 8 Shane Ambler Re: Possible regression in i386 build with gcc 4.6 114. Oct 8 Eitan Adler Re: General usefulness of option descriptions 115. Oct 7 Tijl Coosemans Re: Possible regression in i386 build with gcc 4.6 116. Oct 7 AP Community & educational development 117. Oct 7 Doug Barton Re: General usefulness of option descriptions 118. Oct 7 ohauer@FreeBSD.org Re: ports/171539: [patch] net-mgmt/nrpe2 small fixes 119. Oct 7 Boris Samorodov Re: FreeBSD Port: misc/mc-light 120. Oct 7 Antonio Kless Re: FreeBSD Port: misc/mc-light
121. Oct 7 Danilo Egea Zenity port update to version 3.6 and new options framework 122. Oct 7 Milan Obuch Re: General usefulness of option descriptions 123. Oct 7 Marcus von Appen Re: General usefulness of option descriptions 124. Oct 7 Michael Gmelin General usefulness of option descriptions 125. Oct 7 linimon@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden 126. Oct 7 linimon@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion 127. Oct 7 linimon@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion 128. Oct 7 linimon@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken 129. Oct 7 linimon@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken 130. Oct 7 Jamie Paul Griffin Re: [CHANGE PROPOSAL] Moving WWW from pkg-descr to Makefile 131. Oct 7 Shane Ambler Re: Possible regression in i386 build with gcc 4.6 132. Oct 7 Michael Gmelin Re: [REMINDER] Please convert your ports to the new options framework 133. Oct 7 marcos alves Re: Ports request


home | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date