2012/freebsd-stable/20121104.freebsd-stable
Messages: 132, sorted by subject
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:24:44 UTC 2023
|
|
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Nov 1 Tom Lislegaard RE: 9-Stable panic: resource_list_unreserve: can't find resource 2. Nov 1 Andriy Gapon Re: 9-Stable panic: resource_list_unreserve: can't find resource 3. Nov 2 Tom Lislegaard RE: 9-Stable panic: resource_list_unreserve: can't find resource 4. Nov 2 Andriy Gapon Re: 9-Stable panic: resource_list_unreserve: can't find resource 5. Oct 31 Tom Lislegaard 9-Stable panic: resource_list_unreserve: can't find resource 6. Oct 31 Andriy Gapon Re: 9-Stable panic: resource_list_unreserve: can't find resource 7. Nov 1 Brett Glass 9.1 stability/robustness? 8. Nov 2 pulley@dabus.com Re: 9.1 stability/robustness? 9. Oct 29 <chinalightsourcea@aliyun. =?UTF-8?B?TEVEIHJvcGUgbGlnaHRzIA==?= 10. Nov 2 Bas Smeelen [patch proposal typo corrected] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 11. Nov 2 Bas Smeelen Re: [patch proposal typo corrected] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 12. Nov 2 Bas Smeelen [patch proposal] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 13. Nov 2 Bas Smeelen [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 14. Nov 2 Mateusz Guzik Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 15. Nov 2 Gary Palmer Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 16. Nov 2 Bas Smeelen Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 17. Nov 2 Bas Smeelen Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 18. Nov 2 Mateusz Guzik Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 19. Nov 3 Mark Felder Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 20. Nov 3 Ian Lepore Re: [patch] Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO
21. Oct 29 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 22. Oct 29 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8 tinderbox] failure on arm/arm 23. Oct 29 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 24. Oct 29 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98 25. Oct 29 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8 tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64 26. Oct 29 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8 tinderbox] failure on mips/mips 27. Oct 29 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc 28. Oct 29 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 29. Oct 29 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 30. Oct 31 Miroslav Lachman ACPI Error: No handler for Region [POWS] (0xffffff000994f380) [IPMI] on Cisco UCS 31. Oct 30 Steven Nikkel CPU Competition Issue 32. Oct 30 Chuck Burns Re: CPU Competition Issue 33. Oct 30 Andriy Gapon Re: CPU Competition Issue 34. Oct 30 Shane Ambler Re: CPU Competition Issue 35. Oct 30 steven_nikkel@ertyu.org Re: CPU Competition Issue 36. Oct 30 Steven Nikkel Re: CPU Competition Issue 37. Nov 2 Brett Glass FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness? 38. Nov 2 Doug Hardie Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness? 39. Nov 2 Rainer Duffner Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness? 40. Nov 2 Thomas Mueller Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness?
41. Nov 2 George Mitchell Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness? 42. Nov 2 pete wright Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness? 43. Nov 2 Mark Saad Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness? 44. Nov 2 Rainer Duffner Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness? 45. Nov 3 Shane Ambler Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness? 46. Nov 3 Mark Saad Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness? 47. Nov 3 Rainer Duffner Re: FreeBSD 9.1 stability/robustness? 48. Nov 3 Ken Smith FreeBSD 9.1-RC3 Available... 49. Nov 2 Wojciech A. Koszek Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too! 50. Nov 3 Eugene Grosbein Re: freebsd-update and sources of 9.1-RC3 51. Nov 3 jb Re: freebsd-update and sources of 9.1-RC3 52. Nov 3 Eugene Grosbein freebsd-update and surces of 9.1-RC3 53. Nov 3 jb Re: freebsd-update and surces of 9.1-RC3 54. Oct 30 Dave George Halloween Weekend Sale Get 15% Off this Weekend 55. Oct 30 ThirdAge Is Your Computer Safe? Get StrongHold Computer Backup Today! 56. Nov 3 Bane Ivosev kvm vlan virtio problem 57. Nov 3 Bryan Venteicher Re: kvm vlan virtio problem 58. Nov 2 Attilio Rao Re: lock violation in unionfs (9.0-STABLE r230270) 59. Nov 3 Harald Schmalzbauer Re: lock violation in unionfs (9.0-STABLE r230270) 60. Oct 29 Harald Schmalzbauer Re: lock violation in unionfs (9.0-STABLE r230270)
61. Oct 31 Harald Schmalzbauer Re: lock violation in unionfs (9.0-STABLE r230270) 62. Nov 1 Andreas Nilsson Re: make release fails on find 63. Oct 30 Andreas Nilsson make release fails on find 64. Oct 30 Glen Barber Re: make release fails on find 65. Oct 30 Andreas Nilsson Re: make release fails on find 66. Oct 30 Glen Barber Re: make release fails on find 67. Oct 30 Andreas Nilsson Re: make release fails on find 68. Oct 30 Andreas Nilsson Re: make release fails on find 69. Oct 30 Glen Barber Re: make release fails on find 70. Oct 31 Andreas Nilsson Re: make release fails on find 71. Oct 31 Glen Barber Re: make release fails on find 72. Oct 31 Glen Barber Re: make release fails on find 73. Oct 31 Glen Barber Re: make release fails on find 74. Oct 31 Glen Barber Re: make release fails on find 75. Oct 31 Andreas Nilsson Re: make release fails on find 76. Oct 31 Andreas Nilsson Re: make release fails on find 77. Oct 31 Andreas Nilsson Re: make release fails on find 78. Oct 31 Glen Barber Re: make release fails on find 79. Oct 31 Glen Barber Re: make release fails on find 80. Nov 1 Steven Hartland Re: mfi corrupts JBOD disks >2TB due to LBA overflow (was: ZFS corruption due to l
81. Nov 2 Steven Hartland Re: mfi corrupts JBOD disks >2TB due to LBA overflow (was: ZFS corruption due to l 82. Oct 30 Adam Strohl No buffer space available / tcp_inpcb value 83. Oct 30 Adrian Chadd Re: No buffer space available / tcp_inpcb value 84. Oct 30 Adam Strohl Re: No buffer space available / tcp_inpcb value 85. Oct 30 Navdeep Parhar Re: No buffer space available / tcp_inpcb value 86. Oct 30 Alfred Perlstein Re: No buffer space available / tcp_inpcb value 87. Nov 1 Eugene Grosbein Re: Panic during kernel boot, igb-init related? (8.3-RELEASE) 88. Oct 31 Charles Owens Panic during kernel boot, igb-init related? (8.3-RELEASE) 89. Nov 2 Bas Smeelen SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 90. Nov 2 Adam Strohl Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 91. Nov 2 Mike Jakubik Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 92. Nov 2 Maxim Khitrov Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 93. Nov 2 Adam Strohl Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 94. Nov 2 Mike Jakubik Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 95. Nov 2 Mateusz Guzik Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 96. Nov 2 Bas Smeelen Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 97. Nov 2 Daniel Eischen Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 98. Nov 2 Bas Smeelen Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 99. Nov 3 Mark Felder Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 100. Nov 3 Maxim Khitrov Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO
101. Nov 3 Mark Felder Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 102. Nov 3 Zoran Kolic Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 103. Nov 3 jb Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 104. Nov 3 Jeremy Chadwick Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO 105. Oct 30 Alfred Perlstein tmpfs nfs exports? 106. Oct 30 Kevin Lo Re: tmpfs nfs exports? 107. Oct 30 Konstantin Belousov Re: tmpfs nfs exports? 108. Oct 30 Alfred Perlstein Re: tmpfs nfs exports? 109. Oct 30 jb Re: tmpfs nfs exports? 110. Oct 30 Dan Nelson Re: tmpfs nfs exports? 111. Oct 30 Alfred Perlstein Re: tmpfs nfs exports? 112. Nov 3 Brett Glass Why is SU+J undesirable on SSDs? 113. Nov 3 Adam Vande More Re: Why is SU+J undesirable on SSDs? 114. Nov 3 Jeff Roberson Re: Why is SU+J undesirable on SSDs? 115. Nov 3 Jeff Roberson Re: Why is SU+J undesirable on SSDs? 116. Nov 3 Ian Lepore Re: Why is SU+J undesirable on SSDs? 117. Nov 3 Karl Denninger Re: Why is SU+J undesirable on SSDs? 118. Nov 3 Brett Glass Re: Why is SU+J undesirable on SSDs? 119. Nov 3 Jeff Roberson Re: Why is SU+J undesirable on SSDs? 120. Nov 3 Brett Glass Re: Why is SU+J undesirable on SSDs?
121. Nov 2 Oleg V. Nauman WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS buildworld broken on STABLE-9 122. Nov 3 Dimitry Andric Re: WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS buildworld broken on STABLE-9 123. Nov 1 Steven Hartland Re: ZFS corruption due to lack of space? 124. Nov 1 Steven Hartland Re: ZFS corruption due to lack of space? 125. Nov 1 Steven Hartland Re: ZFS corruption due to lack of space? 126. Nov 1 Steven Hartland Re: ZFS corruption due to lack of space? 127. Nov 1 Peter Jeremy Re: ZFS corruption due to lack of space? 128. Nov 2 Steven Hartland Re: ZFS corruption due to lack of space? 129. Oct 31 Steven Hartland Re: ZFS corruption due to lack of space? 130. Oct 31 Artem Belevich Re: ZFS corruption due to lack of space? 131. Oct 31 Peter Jeremy Re: ZFS corruption due to lack of space? 132. Oct 31 Ryan Stone Re: ZFS corruption due to lack of space?
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date